Rose vs. Unitas which one? Opinions wanted please

I just had a discussion with a friend of mine. Which card is the better card to buy/own, 63 Topps Pete Rosa PSA 8 or a 57 Topps John Unitas PSA 8? What does the board think?
PackManInNC
0
Comments
Maybe one day he gets into the HOF????
<< <i>the johnny u is a great looking card >>
This is true also
and the Unitas card is much better looking than the disembodied heads Rookie Stars card (obviously).
I see some nice PSA 7 Unitas cards on eBay in the 600 to 800 bucks range.
Maybe you could get a 7 for both cards, rather than an 8 for just one.
My eBay Store: Chosen Point's Heroic Diversions eBay Store
In terms of investment, I suppose if Rose gets in the HOF, higher grade examples could get a bump from PSA Registry competition. Then again, I suspect most who are chasing teh BB HOF RC set already have a Rose RC. Many feel vintage football, and HOF RCs in particular, are undervalued compared to their baseball counterparts. Football continues to grow in popularity and the thinking is football collectors will too?
As far as wow factor, if you were to ask 100 vintage football guys to list their top 10 cards in the hobby, I suspect the vast majority would include the Unitas. How many vintage baseball guys would include Rose?
In terms of appearance, it ain't even close to me, 1957 Topps football wins in a landslide.
Snorto~
Agree that older football is undervalued and underated.
Rose goes in the HOF. big plus.
Rose, will never be reinstated. He broke the only rule that is unforgivable.
"Molon Labe"
<< <i>Personally I can't stand Rose's rookie card, probably the ugliest one ever in the history of rookie cards. >>
1966 Sutton RC has it beat. Bad design, airbrush, and a horrible pic to boot.
Kiss me twice.....let's party.
Unitas is more of a sure thing; and, a pretty card.
There is NO reason to think that Rose will ever be
in the HOF. I wish he was - he deserves it - but I
get less - not more - optimistic as time passes.