Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Does this Mays auto look good?

Opinions?

image

Comments

  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I say it's phonier than the proverbial $3 bill!


    Steve
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    I have a couple of Mays auto'd balls and this card looks a lot different than both of the balls. (Not saying mine are the real deal, but I think they are.) Also, I don't remember seeing a Mays auto like the one on that card, although I guess it's possible that the sharpie has really distorted the sig.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • goraidersgoraiders Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭

    I think gai was certifying the card,not the auto.
    J.R.
    Needs'
    1972 Football-9's high#'s
    1965 Football-8's
    1958 Topps FB-7-8
  • Not sure why someone would forge a signature on that card. Most likely sell for considerably more unsigned.
    Collecting Pre-War, Pre-War HOF Types, Pre-War Postcards
  • AllenAllen Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I think gai was certifying the card,not the auto. >>



    No, GAI CERTIFIED is how they slab the autos. This is supposedly a vintage signature in ballpoint.
  • goraidersgoraiders Posts: 2,158 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I think gai was certifying the card,not the auto. >>



    No, GAI CERTIFIED is how they slab the autos. This is supposedly a vintage signature in ballpoint. >>



    I was making a funny,I think the auto is off.
    J.R.
    Needs'
    1972 Football-9's high#'s
    1965 Football-8's
    1958 Topps FB-7-8
  • Definitely no good.
    3000 Hit CLub signed ball - 8/19 Living Members
    image

    Successful Deals: tennesseebanker, jvette,
  • MJB14MJB14 Posts: 39 ✭✭
    I'd say no. The only thing that I sometimes wonder with something that is that bad of a forgery being pawned off as real is if it was signed at something other than an appearence. I have a Dan Fouts auto obtained at a terminal in the airport that no one, even myself. would believe is real if I didn't see him sign it. So there is a SLIGHT possibilility that he presented Mays the card somewhere and Willie signed it sloppily while standing there holding the card in his hand. As for me, I still wouldn't touch it authenticated or not unless I saw him sign it myself. JMO
    Collecting anything Dan Fouts, Jim Rice, Chris Webber, Ron Francis & Coming Soon: Aaron Hernandez.
  • mrmint23mrmint23 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭
    image
  • fkwfkw Posts: 1,766 ✭✭
    Mays' sig has changed many times over the years, that looks like a mid 80s one signed in a hurry.

    No con is going to fake a sig on that card with a crappy feltpen...... especially a living player who signed freely back then.

    PS that card is worth far less now than if it were unsigned IMO

    image
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I kinda believe - as fkw - that it's a real sig signed in haste.

    Here's one of his transition sigs from his really early clean sig to his newer sigs which are not recognizable as Mays IMO.

    image
    Mike
  • mccardguy1mccardguy1 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭
    This is the auto I received in the late 70's early 80's.

    image
    I am on a budget and I am not afraid to use it!!
  • corvette1340corvette1340 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I say it's phonier than the proverbial $3 bill!


    Steve >>



    not to get off track, but I have a $3 bill listed on Ebay right now. I real one!

    $3 Dollar Bill
  • corvette1340corvette1340 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭
    as to the Mays. I'd be inclined to buy it for a discount and take my chances.
  • JHS5120JHS5120 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭
    That signature is from the late seventies early eighties. It is most likely authentic, all of the other examples people have shown to "compare" are examples from the past decade (with perhaps one exception). This is like taking a 1953 mantle sig and trying to campare it to a 1994 mantle sig, you can't. The sig is real in my book, but then again, you can never know.
    My eBay Store =)

    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
  • bbcemporiumbbcemporium Posts: 684 ✭✭✭
    When it comes to auto authentication, has GAI been a reputable source in the past? How about currently?
    Registry Sets

    "Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it"
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,486 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That signature is from the late seventies early eighties. It is most likely authentic, all of the other examples people have shown to "compare" are examples from the past decade (with perhaps one exception). This is like taking a 1953 mantle sig and trying to campare it to a 1994 mantle sig, you can't. The sig is real in my book, but then again, you can never know. >>

    Not sure I agree with your time frame.

    His sig with the Willie that looks more like a 4 has been around since 1992 - my son got his sig on a ball and bat and it looks pretty much like the one mrmint posted.

    I really think the sig where one can see the "Willie" - as such (as I posted above) - is an 80s sig and perhaps earlier.

    image

    One can see his sig in 1952 was clear and along the way it got less and less readable.
    Mike
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The earliest Mays signature I have, was obtained in 1979, and it is one of the "4illie"s.

    I would say that any signatures where the W actually resembles a W, is from no later than the mid-late 1970s.

    Steve
Sign In or Register to comment.