Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Another "can this be right?" post

SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
It can't be the scan, can it?


61 Aaron

"Molon Labe"

Comments

  • waxpackwaxpack Posts: 547
    What am I missing?
    Trying to climb the 1954-55 Topps Hockey ladder for the second time.

  • SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
    Looks like print dots all over the place.

    "Molon Labe"

  • waxpackwaxpack Posts: 547
    Yes your right, now I see them.

    I need glasses image
    Trying to climb the 1954-55 Topps Hockey ladder for the second time.

  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    NO WAY IN HELL is that an "8"!!!!!
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • relaxedrelaxed Posts: 569 ✭
    Looking back at some of Aaron's past sales on the 1961's on VCP there are some print marks on some of them but this example I think is the worst for a PSA 8.
    Collecting 1955 Topps BB
  • captainthreeputtcaptainthreeputt Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
    That is the worst PSA 8 I have ever seen!
    1911 C55 hockey
    1935 National Chicle
    1961 Golden Press
    1962 Bell Brand Dodgers
    Top 200 cards in the hobby
    Top 250 cards in the hobby
    All time lakers
    All time Dodgers
    1957 Disney Characters
    1965 Donruss Disneyland
    1966 Get Smart
    Brian
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,249 ✭✭✭✭✭
    With print dots that bad, that card really should get a PD qualifier in my opinion. Perhaps PSA doesn't consider print dots a PD qualifier - I'm not sure.
  • EstilEstil Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Way too many print circles for an 8. And the centering is kinda questionable too; am I wrong?
    WISHLIST
    D's: 50P,49S,45D+S,43D,41S,40D,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
    Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
    74T: 241,435,610,654 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
    73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
    95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings
  • BrickBrick Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It seems the lower quality the card the more likely the seller says "WOW", uses $ signs, or states the SMR. Sometimes they show the SMR for a card with no qualifiers when the card for sale has one.
    Collecting 1960 Topps Baseball in PSA 8
    http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/

    Ralph

  • MULLINS5MULLINS5 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It seems the lower quality the card the more likely the seller says "WOW", uses $ signs, or states the SMR. Sometimes they show the SMR for a card with no qualifiers when the card for sale has one. >>



    very true...with all of my listings I keep the description very simple...let the card, title, and image sell the card...it's not up to me to tell the buyers how "rare" or "awesome!" a card is.

    here is an example of one of my descriptions:

    You are purchasing the card in the title only.

    Shipping within the US and to Canada is free for this item.

    All reasonable offers will be considered.

    If you have any questions please ask before purchase as there are no returns.

    Thank you for looking.
  • bbuckner22bbuckner22 Posts: 1,028 ✭
    Looks like the 4SC grader got a hold of this one. Agreed, that is one bad looking 8.
    From what I can tell, 707 is the DOLLAR STORE compared to deans_cards. For what that guy charges, if I ever bought anything from him I would expect it to be delivered to me in a frickin' limo.
    ~WalterSobchak
  • WalterSobchakWalterSobchak Posts: 2,096
    I hope that grader is assigned to the entire group bulk sub!!!!

    image
    'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.'
    -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14

    *1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
    *Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA
  • 72skywalker72skywalker Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It seems the lower quality the card the more likely the seller says "WOW", uses $ signs, or states the SMR. Sometimes they show the SMR for a card with no qualifiers when the card for sale has one. >>



    I still love when they all put RARE on their items. Do you want to know what is RARE? My productivity at work since I joined this site.
    Collecting Yankees and vintage Star Wars
  • EstilEstil Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RARE is by far the most cliched and overused term on Ebay. And most items labeled "rare" aren't really rare at all.
    WISHLIST
    D's: 50P,49S,45D+S,43D,41S,40D,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
    Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
    74T: 241,435,610,654 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
    73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
    95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings
  • VintageCardLoverVintageCardLover Posts: 584 ✭
    print dots are very common, but these are distracting is the tilt lol.
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    61 Topps are notorious for this problem. I have seen other Aarons with this issue. PSA seems to allow more print dots in the name panels versus the picture though. In reality I have actually seen worse.

    This card is reminescent of WIWAG type cards.
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,487 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    I have to say - I've seen worse.
    Mike
  • fiveninerfiveniner Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭
    UUUUUGGGGGGLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Tony(AN ANGEL WATCHES OVER ME)
Sign In or Register to comment.