Ripken for group sub - Pick one or all !!!

Thinking of sending in a Ripken on the group sub.
Which one of these would you send and what grade or grades do you think they would get ?
The one with the most votes goes.
I'll let everyone know the results when received back.
Pulled from vending years ago.
Thanks in advance helping me decide.
Crazylegs

Which one of these would you send and what grade or grades do you think they would get ?
The one with the most votes goes.
I'll let everyone know the results when received back.
Pulled from vending years ago.
Thanks in advance helping me decide.
Crazylegs


Craig AKA "Crazylegs"
0
Comments
What grades do you think they'll pull !!!
2nd -- Looks like some chipping on the bottom under Topps
3rd -- Top Left looks touched.. (my Guess will pull an 8)
I would think they all should pull an 8.
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
My guess is they'll all come back 7s... they can be pretty tough on this card. Just ask Bill!
<< <i>1st -- Don't like the bottom right corner looks touched (My Guess will pull an 8)
2nd -- Looks like some chipping on the bottom under Topps
3rd -- Top Left looks touched.. (my Guess will pull an 8)
I would think they all should pull an 8. >>
Didn't notice the chipping on # 2 (middle card) Thanks.
Think I'll pull that one unless people think it will still get an 8.
<< <i>All three have great centering but all three have a red spot in the upper left corner of Schneider, a blue spot on Cal's chin, and a print spot in the M. Guess it depends on how good a mood they're in as to how much they'll penalize for that. Edges on two don't look as good as 1 and 3. At under $5, I'd go all three too. >>
They all came from the same vending run so I guess the consistant marks make sense.
That's why multiple eyes are better.
Thought the centering on all was nice.
Thanks all.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." Dr. Seuss
ANYWAY, I say the best grade will be #3, followed by #1 and then #2.
GOOD LUCK!
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
<< <i>I found the pic of the one I subbed that got a 9 for comparison.
Wow !!! That got a 9 !!
The mark by Cal is far more noticeable and detracting on yours. IMHO.
I think all of mine look nicer. Again IMHO.
I'm just worried if they all get subbed the hidden dots may stand a chance of getting them all knocked down.
Does one person look at all the cards.
<< <i>I found the pic of the one I subbed that got a 9 for comparison.
I sure would like to see this card in a 9 holder,can't see
how that dot would slide by.I would send the 3rd. if your only going
to send one,but again for $5 bucks each,I'd sub all 3.
J.R.
Needs'
1972 Football-9's high#'s
1965 Football-8's
1958 Topps FB-7-8
<< <i>
<< <i>I found the pic of the one I subbed that got a 9 for comparison.
I sure would like to see this card in a 9 holder,can't see
how that dot would slide by.I would send the 3rd. if your only going
to send one,but again for $5 bucks each,I'd sub all 3.
J.R. >>
I sold it to board member bporter26 for less than VCP average shipped. If he has a scan he can share.
and to be fair, it did have perfect centering and corners.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I found the pic of the one I subbed that got a 9 for comparison.
I sure would like to see this card in a 9 holder,can't see
how that dot would slide by.I would send the 3rd. if your only going
to send one,but again for $5 bucks each,I'd sub all 3.
J.R. >>
I sold it to board member bporter26 for less than VCP average shipped. If he has a scan he can share.
and to be fair, it did have perfect centering and corners. >>
I agree the centering is great.
Meant no disrespect. I just can't take my eyes off the dot by Cal.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I found the pic of the one I subbed that got a 9 for comparison.
I sure would like to see this card in a 9 holder,can't see
how that dot would slide by.I would send the 3rd. if your only going
to send one,but again for $5 bucks each,I'd sub all 3.
J.R. >>
I sold it to board member bporter26 for less than VCP average shipped. If he has a scan he can share.
and to be fair, it did have perfect centering and corners. >>
I agree the centering is great.
Meant no disrespect. I just can't take my eyes off the dot by Cal. >>
One fisheye that doesn't detract from the overall esthetics of the card - which otherwise is a 9 will remain a 9 IMO.
But, I can see how some might not like them - to me they're just part of the 'charm' that is a baseball card.
mike
edit: also rought cuts that appear in the form of edge chipping that doesn't affect the corner will also be overlooked when determining a grade from what I understand.
nice cards
good luck
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started