Holy Grail !

majorflux · December 3, 2009 6:07PM

http://www.memorylaneinc.com/site/bid/bidplace.asp?itemid=15111

Mikan 48 Bowman rc PSA 10! Let's see if this goes anywhere close to where the MJ Fleer 86 rc BGS 10 went for.

nightcrawler · December 3, 2009 6:30PM

The white whale..

VintageCardLover · December 3, 2009 11:07PM

trimmed.

Nathaniel1960 · December 4, 2009 1:12AM

<< <i>trimmed. >>

Bottom right? What kind of lunatic would even attempt to trim a Mikan RC? Maybe if you went to Antwerp and had a diamond cutter do it.

vladguerrero · December 4, 2009 1:14AM

<< <i>trimmed. >>

AND O/C

baseballfan · December 4, 2009 1:19AM

WOW!!

looks nice to me

jamesryanbell · December 4, 2009 2:31AM

It's a PSA 10. They determine the quality, not you. You have to freak out at how awesome it is...not second guess them.

hammered · December 4, 2009 2:45AM

I get why rough edge cuts are appealing to some people. I am OK with PSA 9s having rough cuts.
But I cannot understand how a grader puts a 10 on that card considering its left edge - especially on a card like that, which is bound to attract a lot of scrutiny.
And that left edge is more than rough - it is a really, really bad edge.

Brian48 · December 4, 2009 3:20AM

If the rough edge is normal for the cutting process of the card, I believe PSA will allow it. I've seen some '54 Topps baseball with really fuzzy edges that were graded 10.

lawnmowerman · December 4, 2009 3:23AM

123Slider · December 4, 2009 4:33AM

<< <i>

>>

I don't think George had his lipstick on for this card, what a bummer. Thanks for the flashback Matt.

bobsbbcards · December 4, 2009 7:05AM

The rough cut doesn't bother me at all (I heart rough cuts), but the left to right centering isn't good enough for a 10 (IMOSHO).

eagles33 · December 4, 2009 7:26AM

i agree.. how can something be a 10 when its clearly not centered? don't get me wrong.. its a great card and in great condition for card from 1948.. its not gem mint perfect..

Holy Grail !

Comments