Baseball cards you should have bought in 2002! (according to Forbes in 2002)

Comments

• Dboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭

  November 28, 2009 6:07AM

  That was only if you wanted to lose a lot of money! LOL

  STAY HEALTHY!
  
  Doug
  
  Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.

  0
• Ironmanfan Posts: 5,525 ✭✭✭✭

  November 28, 2009 6:11AM

  looked to me mostly guys later linked to PEDs

  Successful dealings with Wcsportscards94558, EagleEyeKid, SamsGirl214, Volver, DwayneDrain, Oaksey25, Griffins, Cardfan07, Etc.

  0
• WalterSobchak Posts: 2,096

  November 28, 2009 6:12AM

  Thanks for the laugh.
  
  Hadn't it already been pretty well established by 2002 that those cards were never, ever going to be worth very much?
  
  
  

  'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.'
  -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
  
  *1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
  *Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA

  0
• therebelas Posts: 167

  November 28, 2009 8:30AM

  What's up with the 1991 Bowman love? At least the Stadium Club Bagwell is worth more.

  0
• Sabrgeek Posts: 484

  November 28, 2009 9:08AM

  Well; I certainly did not have a good day giving advice. However; I still believe there is some potential in 1991 Bowman as almost no one has large stocks of those cards and there might be a lot less of those cards out there than you might think.
  
  And Robbby Alomar has a HOF shot; although I don't know why I did not prefer the 88 Score Supplement card.
  
  Regards
  Rich
  
  Well, it's nice that someone dredged up my quotes from back in the day
  
  

  Plano, Tx. Card Show #5, Sunday March 6, 2016 at Adat Chaverim (Northeast Corner Independence and Spring Creek) in Plano Tx 9Am to 4 PM. See you there!

  0