I'd call it pre economic meltdown close to realistic on mainstream regular issue cards - currently mostly overpriced on mainstream cards as prices have not been adjusted to reflect "real" prices. Totally in another world (too low) on some of the rarer cards, condition scarcities and food and test issues!
I think it really depends on what year you are asking the question about...as I believe the older "vintage" prices are to low in some years in SMR...the "book" is very inaccurate with 1960's and 1950's cards....don't know about cards in the 70's or later...it also depends on what set is currently the "hot" set...which year...two or three highend buyers can really drive up the prices of cards...so much for "book"....
Henri Collector Topps 58,59,60,61,62,63,64 Sets Fleer 60, 61-62 Sets
Personally I feel that the SMR pricing is awful. The registry is the key. Look at the pop reports. There are low pop commons I've seen go for 3 times what high pop stars have gone for!
<< <i>For many cards you can throw SMR out the window. >>
That would be littering and should not be condoned!
On a side note, I put an SMR in my dog's "accident" tray and he looked at me and said, "Wouldn't that be redundant?"
Prices are all over the board and typically are not an accurate reflection of the market. Additionally, the same could be said with regard to Beckett's pricing. Although, with regard to graded card pricing, I would suggest that Beckett's GCI is more consistently accurate than SMR. Any buyer or seller would be best served to do their homework in advance of buying or selling any card of significant value.
Major auction houses are still using it as a reference. So, it is relevant.
Accurate?? Hardly!!
50's Fb high grade ??? Not even close. Low pop commons?? Simply a joke when someone tries referencing SMR. You just have to move on when trading partners don't understand the influence of the population report.
I gladly pay PSA 9 prices and more for many PSA8s. Anybody have a 1955B Fb 137 Kyle Rote in 8?? $60?? 10X SMR won't buy that card. The whole set is riddled with similar scarcities and ridiculous SMR prices. Have some of the lower commons dipped below SMR?? A few, but in general SMR is still low on many 50s high grade cards.
<< <i>Major auction houses are still using it as a reference. So, it is relevant.
Accurate?? Hardly!!
50's Fb high grade ??? Not even close. Low pop commons?? Simply a joke when someone tries referencing SMR. You just have to move on when trading partners don't understand the influence of the population report.
I gladly pay PSA 9 prices and more for many PSA8s. Anybody have a 1955B Fb 137 Kyle Rote in 8?? $60?? 10X SMR won't buy that card. The whole set is riddled with similar scarcities and ridiculous SMR prices. Have some of the lower commons dipped below SMR?? A few, but in general SMR is still low on many 50s high grade cards. >>
I think it would be best to throw out the SMR "price guide" and replace it with realized prices through major auction houses and eBay for the key cards in the set.
I don't see the strategic reason for PSA to produce SMR, when the realized prices would 1) be more helpful, and 2) show collectors how much PSA grading adds value to cards.
I do not use SMR as a reference for any of my purchases.
It is good for a few things as a price guide notably what cards are SP. Also, the 1953 Topps cards seem to be pretty close. I generally get around SMR for properly graded PSA cards.
However overall it is lacking. It can be useful for certain cards.
Comments
Collector
Topps 58,59,60,61,62,63,64 Sets
Fleer 60, 61-62 Sets
77 Yaz PSA 9
77 Dave Collins PSA 9
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
<< <i>For many cards you can throw SMR out the window. >>
That would be littering and should not be condoned!
On a side note, I put an SMR in my dog's "accident" tray and he looked at me and said, "Wouldn't that be redundant?"
Prices are all over the board and typically are not an accurate reflection of the market. Additionally, the same could be said with regard to Beckett's pricing. Although, with regard to graded card pricing, I would suggest that Beckett's GCI is more consistently accurate than SMR. Any buyer or seller would be best served to do their homework in advance of buying or selling any card of significant value.
Accurate?? Hardly!!
50's Fb high grade ??? Not even close. Low pop commons?? Simply a joke when someone tries referencing SMR. You just have to move on when trading partners don't understand the influence of the population report.
I gladly pay PSA 9 prices and more for many PSA8s. Anybody have a 1955B Fb 137 Kyle Rote in 8?? $60?? 10X SMR won't buy that card. The whole set is riddled with similar scarcities and ridiculous SMR prices. Have some of the lower commons dipped below SMR?? A few, but in general SMR is still low on many 50s high grade cards.
<< <i>Major auction houses are still using it as a reference. So, it is relevant.
Accurate?? Hardly!!
50's Fb high grade ??? Not even close. Low pop commons?? Simply a joke when someone tries referencing SMR. You just have to move on when trading partners don't understand the influence of the population report.
I gladly pay PSA 9 prices and more for many PSA8s. Anybody have a 1955B Fb 137 Kyle Rote in 8?? $60?? 10X SMR won't buy that card. The whole set is riddled with similar scarcities and ridiculous SMR prices. Have some of the lower commons dipped below SMR?? A few, but in general SMR is still low on many 50s high grade cards. >>
I don't see the strategic reason for PSA to produce SMR, when the realized prices would 1) be more helpful, and 2) show collectors how much PSA grading adds value to cards.
I do not use SMR as a reference for any of my purchases.
-Nathanael
cards seem to be pretty close. I generally get around SMR for properly graded PSA cards.
However overall it is lacking. It can be useful for certain cards.
Steve