<< <i>Im not an expert but the slant of the"antle" looks off. >>
the majority of mantles are consistent but I've seen some funky Mantles that are real, c'mon though, the guy was drunk most of the time Great card, I vote real.
It passed PSA/DNA quick opinion so I bought it and will sub it soon. I thought it was legit from the time I saw it, but I always value the boards input. I think Mantle probably tried to sign on the white area per someones request and it makes the letters look a little different then they often do.
It passed PSA/DNA quick opinion so I bought it and will sub it soon. I thought it was legit from the time I saw it, but I always value the boards input. I think Mantle probably tried to sign on the white area per someones request and it makes the letters look a little different then they often do.
I am no expert by any means but have handled or saved scans of enough Mantles over the past 6 years, it looks good to me. Mantle signed most of the '53 Topps I've seen in the same spot on the card, some might be higher towards his face/middle of the card but overall I have seen 3-4 signed in the same spot as yours. For a while I think I saw more '52s signed than '53s but more '53s have come up for sale in the past 2-3 years. Nice pickup!
Comments
I wouldn't be surprised if it was real.
<< <i>
.........
PSA/DNA
That is a great card.
<< <i>Im not an expert but the slant of the"antle" looks off. >>
the majority of mantles are consistent but I've seen some funky Mantles that are real, c'mon though, the guy was drunk most of the time
EDIT: that card is more real than this one! red-zone mantle auto
The reason I say no good is because some of the letters seem to lean to the right. Mantle's letters I always thought were more straight up and down.
Anyone else see what I am seeing?
Looks good to me. I wish my '53 was signed. Nice pickup.
-wes
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
it looks like a real Mick auto to me.
Steve
I saw this one bring $4,094 in May 09