Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Scans of recent poppage - 100% Hockey

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax

Comments

  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice work on the Hulls and Mikitas! I've been looking for a 68 Orr in PSA 6 too - fine job!
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • VitoCo1972VitoCo1972 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭
    some REALLY nice cards there Jim. 60's hockey had some really underrated designs. I like the 68 and 69 ones a lot.
  • vladguerrerovladguerrero Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭
    great pop!
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    WTG Jim ... nice results!
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • those '64 Tallboys are dope. WOW! image
  • Nice stuff - Hawk heavy, but then again you got half the teams in the league repesented (ok, 4 of the 6 teams) and you can't get better than Makita and the Golden Jet.

    It would have been cool to see the TV deign on the tallboys ... I didn't start to collect until the 1970's.

    thanks for posting these.

    cheers

  • Is the centering the only reason for the 6 on the 1968 Orr card? Did you ask for "No Qualifiers" Just curious.
  • jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Is the centering the only reason for the 6 on the 1968 Orr card? Did you ask for "No Qualifiers" Just curious. >>

    Yes and yes
    Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
    MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
  • That sure is a good looking Orr, the eye appeal is nice with the thick portion of the border on the bottom, and zero tilt.

    Great batch of cards Jim, are you putting together any sets from these years?




    Hmmm, I've never owned a tallboy, and that's strange because I really like them.
  • jimradjimrad Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That sure is a good looking Orr, the eye appeal is nice with the thick portion of the border on the bottom, and zero tilt.

    Great batch of cards Jim, are you putting together any sets from these years?




    Hmmm, I've never owned a tallboy, and that's strange because I really like them. >>



    Trent,

    These subs are cards from my sets. I have every hockey set from 53-72.
    Positive transactions with: Bkritz,Bosox1976,Brick,captainthreeputt,cpettimd,craigger,cwazzy,DES1984,Dboneesq,daddymc,Downtown1974,EAsports,EagleEyeKid,fattymacs,gameusedhoop,godblessUSA,goose3,KatsCards,mike22y2k,
    MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
Sign In or Register to comment.