Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1964 Hank Aaron PSA 9 ST... thoughts

leadoff4leadoff4 Posts: 2,392 ✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
I just received this card today from PSA. Thoughts on its value are appreciated(maybe LOL). I guess I was so concerned with its corners and surface, I totally forgot about the back. It's the only '64 Aaron PSA 9 with a qualifier.
image
image

Comments

  • italianstallionyankeesitalianstallionyankees Posts: 541
    Wow! That card is nice! I would say more than $400+ I wander what it would grade with No qualifiers??
    1938 Cartledge Boxing cards psa 7 - psa 10
    1951 Topps Red backs psa 8 only!
    1960 Golden Press Presidential set Psa 8 's - Psa 9's
    1961 Golden Press psa 9's
    1976 Topps baseball psa 9 Stars
    1980 Kelloggs baseball Psa 9's - Psa 10's
    1988-1989 Fleer Basketball psa 9's
    1988-1989 Fleer Stickers psa 9's
    1989-1990 Fleer Basketball psa 10's
    1992 Coca-Cola Donruss Nolan Ryan 1-26 Psa 10 only Gpa 9.80++ E-mail Newyork00007@aol.com
  • PoppaJPoppaJ Posts: 2,818 ✭


    << <i>Wow! That card is nice! I would say more than $400+ I wander what it would grade with No qualifiers?? >>



    /////////////////////////

    Probably a 9!
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    CRACK AND RESUB....see if you can wipe it off at all if it is wax
  • italianstallionyankeesitalianstallionyankees Posts: 541
    Yea!! Where is your panty hose honey???? LOL image Best advice on wax stain removal.
    1938 Cartledge Boxing cards psa 7 - psa 10
    1951 Topps Red backs psa 8 only!
    1960 Golden Press Presidential set Psa 8 's - Psa 9's
    1961 Golden Press psa 9's
    1976 Topps baseball psa 9 Stars
    1980 Kelloggs baseball Psa 9's - Psa 10's
    1988-1989 Fleer Basketball psa 9's
    1988-1989 Fleer Stickers psa 9's
    1989-1990 Fleer Basketball psa 10's
    1992 Coca-Cola Donruss Nolan Ryan 1-26 Psa 10 only Gpa 9.80++ E-mail Newyork00007@aol.com
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    When the wax has sunk into the paper on the back, you're not getting it out.

    Still a nice looking card. It'd probably sell for a lot better than a PSA 7 price.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • daddymcdaddymc Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭
    Very nice looking card and not much of a stain. I agree with digicat that it should bring in better than 7 money if you're selling it.
    Currently working on: Kurt Warner PSA 9 or 10

  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    PSA 7.5. Chaz.

    Seriously, I'd echo the thoughts of those previously stated. Also would be a really nice card for someone's raw set.
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wouldn't sell it for less than an 8 goes for. That card could be an 8 even with the wax. 7 money is giving it away (I'd take it for 7 money image )
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • stevekstevek Posts: 30,211 ✭✭✭✭✭
    dam shame - still a beautiful card.
  • cardpricercardpricer Posts: 45
    That isn't much of a stain at all.

    It's been a while since a 7 sold; however, the average price for a PSA 7 is $89.11. PSA 8s average $235.74. It's quite possible that you can get "8 money" out of that card as the stain appears to be minor at best.

    Here are some recent sales for you to look at:
    08-11-2009 $205.78 PSA 8 EBAY 360177244735 Feedback
    08-09-2009 $321.88 PSA 8 EBAY 290336286479 Feedback
    08-09-2009 $867.54 PSA 9 EBAY 380144481728 Feedback

    Hope that helps.
    Website: http://www.cardpricer.com
    Blog: http://www.cardpricer.com/blog
    Twitter: http://twitter.com/CardPricer
    Email: info@cardpricer.com
  • MBMiller25MBMiller25 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭
    I think its a great looking card, and I completely agree with BoSox1976, I will give PSA 7 money+ for it right now.
  • GoDodgersFanGoDodgersFan Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭
    Wow. I would buy that for PSA 7 money all day long. You should get close to PSA 8.

    Very nice.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Nice card.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • BRDSRBRDSR Posts: 94
    I don't collect '64 or Aaron, but I'm curious about this card. When I saw the title of the thread and then the front of the card, I thought the stain was on Mr. Aaron's face, and I thought that sure was a terrible place for the stain. Obviously it's on the back and the line on his face is in the original and probably the shadow of his cap. Still, I'm not sure I've ever seen a card with such an obvious shadow on the player's face. To me, it lowers the appeal of the card a great deal. Anybody agree?

    As far as the stain, that is tough luck. I've heard you can submit cards with the specific request for no qualifier...as others have said, you probably have a decent shot an 8.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Psa generally will not net grade a 64 topps card if it has a stain or is marked.

    Those will normally get the ST or MK qualifier.

    1914 and 15 cracker jacks will get net graded, while early Bowmans will not suffer any consequences when submitted
    with stains on the reverse.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • leadoff4leadoff4 Posts: 2,392 ✭
    Yes, that is the shadow on his face. All Aaron '64 Topps look like that. My scan doesn't do the front of the card justice.
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That looks like the "good back wax", not the evil staining variety.
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I agree, it appears that it is on top of the card.

    Might be able to get it off.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • leadoff4leadoff4 Posts: 2,392 ✭
    I had the same type stain on a '64 Tops in NL Mays/Musial graded PSA 7ST. I tried to remove the stain... and maybe I did to some extent, but when it was resubmitted it came back as a straight PSA 6. I might be happy to sell this card for around "8 money", then buy a 7 for my set and be thrilled if someone on the boards here got the straight 9. Just sayin'...
Sign In or Register to comment.