OT - Anyone need a loaded 2007 Chevrolet HHR?
corvette1340
Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭
Long story short, guy comes into dealership a few weeks back and wants to pawn his title. I tell him we don't do that, but I'll write him out a personal check if he leaves the car and signs the title over to me. Well, I get a call a couple of days ago and he says the car is mine, lol. Anyway, got it on the bay and I'm gonna sell it cheap. The retail is around $15,000.
2007 Chevrolet HHR
2007 Chevrolet HHR
0
Comments
<< <i>so now this has become an auto classified section? >>
It is if he is willing to trade cards for it, which he said he would. I dont see what the problem is. Jealousy?
<< <i>Did you get a good price?? >>
For the amount he needed, I would have been stupid not to give him the money.
<< <i>
<< <i>so now this has become an auto classified section? >>
It is if he is willing to trade cards for it, which he said he would. I dont see what the problem is. Jealousy? >>
BST
"If this were 1950, we would be pretty impressed by the Chevrolet HHR. Its body style, although lower down with narrower windows, would fit right in with the line of Chevy panel trucks. The automatic transmission would seem a bit luxurious, like something out of a Cadillac, and we would probably try to jam a 45 record into the thin slot below the radio display. The handling would feel in line with most other cars on the road.
But it is not 1950--the 2007 Chevrolet HHR's retro look borrows heavily from Chevy panel vans of that era, which makes it a polarizing car. Similar to the Honda Element or the Scion xB, you're either going to love it or hate it. We're not crazy about the HHR's style, although it's a pretty good take on a 1950s car. The hood and fenders are pretty obvious features hearkening back to the original, but even the tail lights copy those of the 1950s-era panel wagon.
The HHR clearly lacks driving excitement, opting instead for fuel economy with its four-cylinder engine. But that lack of excitement extends to the primitive transmission and the poor handling. For interior tech, the HHR gets a stereo that uses GM's ugly, but functional, interface for terrestrial and satellite radio tuning and MP3 CD track selection. "
try the BST.
<< <i>do we need it? no. should we spend the cash? Here is a review...
"If this were 1950, we would be pretty impressed by the Chevrolet HHR. Its body style, although lower down with narrower windows, would fit right in with the line of Chevy panel trucks. The automatic transmission would seem a bit luxurious, like something out of a Cadillac, and we would probably try to jam a 45 record into the thin slot below the radio display. The handling would feel in line with most other cars on the road.
But it is not 1950--the 2007 Chevrolet HHR's retro look borrows heavily from Chevy panel vans of that era, which makes it a polarizing car. Similar to the Honda Element or the Scion xB, you're either going to love it or hate it. We're not crazy about the HHR's style, although it's a pretty good take on a 1950s car. The hood and fenders are pretty obvious features hearkening back to the original, but even the tail lights copy those of the 1950s-era panel wagon.
The HHR clearly lacks driving excitement, opting instead for fuel economy with its four-cylinder engine. But that lack of excitement extends to the primitive transmission and the poor handling. For interior tech, the HHR gets a stereo that uses GM's ugly, but functional, interface for terrestrial and satellite radio tuning and MP3 CD track selection. "
try the BST. >>
I think it's one of the ugliest cars I've ever seen, but since I've only got $4000 in it I couldn't care less. Equate it to someone giving $4000 for a PSA 4 '52 Mantle when they hate the Mick.
<< <i>Where are you (well, actually the car) located? >>
North Georgia