Review these? Vote for any, none, or all.......

RonBurgundy · July 10, 2009 2:39PM

What do you think? I think there's one that's so obvious PSA should buy me a glass of scotch after they bump it.................

bbcemporium · July 10, 2009 2:43PM

The '62 Yaz is a definite review in my opinion. I really can't tell from the scans if the NM-MT cards would be able to bump. Great cards

storm888 · July 10, 2009 3:02PM

I guess I would try them all.

The Gibson may be maxed out on the eye-appeal score,
but it seems they bump lots of cards with that kind of
centering if the corners are sharp enough.

Some of the '62s seem a tad tilty, but they would prolly
see it differently.

All seem worth a try.

Morgoth · July 10, 2009 3:11PM

I like the Ryan. I would be worried about the Gibson in a bust out coming back min size.

storm888 · July 10, 2009 3:30PM

"...in a bust out.........."

//////////////////////

I would prolly not crack any of 'em.

I would just try for the "review."

WalterSobchak · July 10, 2009 3:57PM

The cards that look obviously undergraded to me from the scans are the Yaz and the Ryan.

Maybe the Flood should be in a 7.5 holder, but IMO the corner wear would prevent it from ever getting a grade higher than that. I don't know if the value difference between a 7 and a 7.5 is worth the money to try, but I'm guessing it isn't.

bobsbbcards · July 10, 2009 4:21PM

Nice Yaz card.

Pigs · July 10, 2009 4:36PM

Ron-- I think you should just do the Yaz, because if that doesn't get bumped none of the others will. JMO

NickM · July 10, 2009 5:05PM

I'd send the Gibson and the Ryan in.

Nick

[edited to make correction]

Bottom9th · July 10, 2009 5:30PM

That Gibson is gorgeous, 8.5 or 9

leadoff4 · July 10, 2009 10:15PM

The Flood or Landrum are the obvious to me. NO doubt.

WinPitcher · July 10, 2009 11:45PM

The Yaz is the only one I'd try.

Steve

RonBurgundy · July 11, 2009 12:34AM

The Yaz is the obvious one to me. Out of the others, I like the Ryan the most. Gibson is really nice but there's a slight corner touch upper left. I think if the Landrum was any other 62 common not named George Witt or Don Landrum, it would be in a PSA 8 holder.

IchiroDeported · July 11, 2009 5:18AM

yaz, ryan for sure.

nam812 · July 11, 2009 5:44AM

The upper right corner (as Ron shows the card horizontally in the scan) worries me about the 1952 Ryan card. The other corners look strong, but, in my opinion, phenomenal centering really helped carry that card to an 8. I dont think it is possible for it to go higher.

daddymc · July 11, 2009 6:06AM

IMHO, for what it's worth, I'd only try on the Yaz.

RonBurgundy · July 11, 2009 6:28AM

I looked at the Ryan. Nick is right. Great catch on that.

Mickey71 · July 11, 2009 6:36AM

I thought with the .5 thing alot of high end 7's would get the .5. ---They have not. I can see where they are very tough on 8's because of the potential substancial increase in value; but the 7's I don't quite understand. The cards that Ron has are very nice and some are very high end. That Yaz is extremely high end and a no doubt 8. That card should have been an automatic 8 with a second look by the grader for consideration to the 8.5. Instead it was a 7 with a second look to a 7.5---I honestly don't understand this.

Mickey71

Bosox1976 · July 11, 2009 7:35AM

Yaz all day long.

Stone193 · July 11, 2009 7:45AM

I agree with the Yaz - I can't always see things from a scan - but that looks more like an 8 to me - unless they hate the upper right corner more than I.

Really nice cards Ron
mike

DamageInc · July 11, 2009 8:53AM

Send in the Yaz
Chaz

(Sorry, I just had to do that

)

Review these? Vote for any, none, or all.......

Comments