Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1953 Topps (MK) or production?

I was going through my '53 Topps cards and noticed a select few that had what looked to be red strands on the surface about a 1/16 of an inch, I couldn't tell if this was part of the paper stock or more of a print ink issue.

Anyone experience or notice this in the '53 cards?

Even my PSA graded Mays has it but PSA did not issue a MK qualifier.
It's quite noticable, so i'm curious if it was a printing issue.

CU Ancient Members badge member.

Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

Comments

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    Now i'm sitting here at work wondering if it's actual pen ink marks that PSA did not pick up on, sweating bullets.....

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    Maybe you guys can pick it up from the scan, I have a couple other raw '53 cards that have similar red marks:

    image

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    huh? I have been selling 53 topps for almost a year now and I never noticed it.

    I don't see it on the Mays you picture either.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I think your card is just fine
  • jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    Steve, I think it's horizontal in the top border on the right side
    image
  • jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    And I think it's ok also, not a pen mark
    image
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Ok, I have seen it on the 53's I have been selling too. What I think it is, is from the sheet that sat
    on it.

    What I mean is the back of a sheet (which is red) left some ink residue on the front of another sheet.

    Nothing to sweat bullets over.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • akuracy503akuracy503 Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭
    Jim got it right the most visible one is on the upper right border, Steve's theory of the stacked cards makes sense as the marks look like remnants of the red ink from the back of the cards.

    Thanks again for the opinions, I can work go back to work without worrying now. image

    CU Ancient Members badge member.

    Collection: https://flickr.com/photos/185200668@N06/albums

  • nightcrawlernightcrawler Posts: 5,110 ✭✭
    I've seen them inkstains/marks on the backs of the 51 Parkies. Of course the backs of those are blank so never on the front.


    Nice Mays. I know, I said that before about your card. It's still nice, lol. image
  • I have that same red mark on some of my 53 topps as well.
    Cory
    ----------------------
    Working on:
    Football
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
    1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
    1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)

    Baseball
    1938 Goudey (56.25%)
    1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
    1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
    1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
    1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
  • fkwfkw Posts: 1,766 ✭✭
    1/16"?

    Thats so small.................. its got to be stray ink from the printing process or from rubbing against other cards after printing (packs and storage)

    Is it the small lines in the background to the left of Mays?

    Nice card BTW....... No way it would get a MK
Sign In or Register to comment.