Bummer of a gum stain...

Bosox1976 · April 26, 2009 12:46AM

Definitely should have gone with the qualifier versus straight grade:

62 Maris

daddymc · April 26, 2009 12:49AM

Wow that is a big penalty for the gum stain. Presents very nice from the front.

stevek · April 26, 2009 12:53AM

heartbreaking to view that back, considering the front.

bman90278 · April 26, 2009 12:57AM

Thats too bad.....the fron't is a beauty.

hotmush · April 26, 2009 1:54AM

Reminds me of that Star Trek: The Next Generation episode where the insane collector has a 62 Maris in a sealed case. He opens it and sniffs. "Smell that? Bubble gum!" Pretty good ep.

WinPitcher · April 26, 2009 2:19AM

A card like that should never get a NO Qualifier.

PSA missed that one.

Steve

WinPitcher · April 26, 2009 2:20AM

I wonder if Dick Towle could clean that card up?

Steve

Bosox1976 · May 7, 2009 1:48PM

Can't believe it sold for $500.

MULLINS5 · May 7, 2009 2:16PM

<< <i>A card like that should never get a NO Qualifier.

PSA missed that one.

Steve >>

agreed

Robeson · May 7, 2009 3:08PM

Would the front of that card be a 9? What would have caused a stain like that? Could that be from a sealed pack that was opened recently?

ploobims · May 7, 2009 3:26PM

Ouch. Its amazing the # of great cards that were ruined by wax and gum in the old days, the front is a beaut!!!!

TNP777 · May 7, 2009 4:08PM

Ouch on the gum stain. The title of the thread immediately reminded me of one of my favorite Gary Larson panels:

Bummer of a birthmark, Hal.

MBMiller25 · May 7, 2009 10:46PM

WOW, That is a very nice card.

lsutigers1973 · May 7, 2009 11:20PM

Someone's going to crack out that card and submit it to SGC.

Bummer of a gum stain...

Comments