An Open Letter to Ultra-Pro Toploaders

How hard is it to produce a toploader that is square? I mean, seriously, 90 degrees, how hard can it be? We don't have many options in the toploader market. I would guess that maybe one in every ten toploaders I pull out of your packages is actually square, and as a result, my scans look like they were done by an epileptic monkey on a coke binge.
You suck.
Signed-
Everybody
You suck.
Signed-
Everybody
0
Comments
Bosox1976
<< <i>What have you got against parallelograms? >>
That's the first time in the history of these boards that anyone has ever used the word "Parallelograms"
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
<< <i>
<< <i>What have you got against parallelograms? >>
That's the first time in the history of these boards that anyone has ever used the word "Parallelograms"
Nay I say!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>What have you got against parallelograms? >>
That's the first time in the history of these boards that anyone has ever used the word "Parallelograms"
Nay I say!
Craig you have bodacious detective skills that leaves Pujols jock collectors in awe.
Nuff said.
CDsNuts, 1/9/15
I'd suggest taking the cards out of the toploaders for scanning, anyway. Not only will they look less coked-up-primate handled, but much clearer as well.
<< <i>Complaint #2 - why won't you make your top loaders out of archivally safe plastic? >>
DING DING DING DING DING!!!
The irks me so much...esp. for my jumbo cards...I can do one of two things...put them in archival safe penny sleeves that won't fit into the jumbo toploaders. Great, my card won't yellow or fall apart, but it will get bent to heck and back. Or, I can go without protection, directly into some hot and melty PVC, only to have some ruined cards a decade later.
Marc was the guy.
<hehe>
Steve
"Molon Labe"