Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1986 steve young.. do you think it will cross??

Comments

  • lawnmowermanlawnmowerman Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks great. No pd's either like most of them have.

    There appears to be a tilt but not too bad.

    Should make it into a 9 slab imo

    1994 Pro Line Live

    TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject

  • BunchOBullBunchOBull Posts: 6,188 ✭✭✭
    I've seen much uglier 9s. Great shot at a crossover.
    Collector of most things Frank Thomas. www.BigHurtHOF.com
  • thedutymonthedutymon Posts: 4,323 ✭
    No Crossover, Crack and Sub, you have an outside chance at a 10, no way it's an 8.....I think!!!!
    Neil
    Actually Collect Non Sport, but am just so full of myself I post all over the place !!!!!!!
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    i say 10 also.

    that card is in sterling condition.

    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭
    Nice card.
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
  • SportsamericaSportsamerica Posts: 990 ✭✭
    Is that some chipping on the right side around thigh height?
    Cory
    ----------------------
    Working on:
    Football
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
    1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
    1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)

    Baseball
    1938 Goudey (56.25%)
    1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
    1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
    1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
    1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    I think it should be able to cross to 9.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I don't want to crack it out.. I am scared to get the dreaded evidence of trimming..

    and there is some faint chipping on the edges..
    youcan see under magnification.. I can't imagine this issue not having it
    just through the regular cutting process.. and the dark colored borders
  • slantycouchslantycouch Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭
    She's a beaut! Looks like a 9 for sure. I'd be scared to crack and sub also though.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I feel like.. cross to a 9...
    then resub the 9 for review and see if it bumps to a 10?
  • MBMiller25MBMiller25 Posts: 6,056 ✭✭
    I think it crosses, Thats a great Young.
  • mrpeanut39mrpeanut39 Posts: 841 ✭✭✭
    I've heard from experienced board members that crackouts are the way to go. I guess the feeling is that PSA is afraid to crackout on a review in case it doesn't meet min grade. I recently sent in some SGC 88 crackouts for my 56 set. But I'm having 2nd thoughts now after hearing people say that PSA is in a cautious/tough grading phase. Lots of evidence of trims. What do you think about sending in for review and putting in a lowball min grade? Like if you had a SGC 88 and put down a 6 for min grade. That way PSA wouldn't be afraid to crack the card out to grade it. Do you think you would get an unbiased grade then? Maybe not a prudent strategy for your 96 Young, but just throwing the idea out there.
    "I think the guy must be practicing voodoo or something. Check out his eyes. Rico's crazier than a peach orchard sow." -- Whitey Herzog, Spring Training 1973
  • bigreddogbigreddog Posts: 1,156
    I prefer it in the SGC holder.

    What is your reason for wanting to cross it?
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    everything I own is psa.. I think the value is better in psa
Sign In or Register to comment.