Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

PSA error Patrick Roy........

goyegoye Posts: 454 ✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
image

Worst part is, I didnt notice it till after I sold it, maybe the buyer will have remorse.........
1985-86 O Pee Chee PSA 910 Hockey

Comments

  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭✭
    Okay, I give... what's the error? Pardon my ignorance, I'm not a Hockey card guy.
  • PoppaJPoppaJ Posts: 2,818 ✭


    << <i>Okay, I give... what's the error? Pardon my ignorance, I'm not a Hockey card guy. >>



    The card in the holder is a "Topps" not an "O-Pee-Chee".

    PoppaJ
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭✭
    Gotcha!! See? I I told you I wasn't a Hockey card guy! (lol)
  • schr1stschr1st Posts: 1,677 ✭✭
    The trained chimps that allowed that to happen need to be fired. There are way too many "Mechanical Errors" on PSA flips.
    Who is Rober Maris?
  • billwaltonsbeardbillwaltonsbeard Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭✭
    Which is more valuable? Topps or OPC?
    My cards on COMC
  • chaz43chaz43 Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Which is more valuable? Topps or OPC? >>




    1988 Topps Baseball. chaz
  • nightcrawlernightcrawler Posts: 5,110 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Which is more valuable? Topps or OPC? >>




    image 1988 Topps Baseball. chaz >>



  • PoppaJPoppaJ Posts: 2,818 ✭


    << <i>Which is more valuable? Topps or OPC? >>



    OPC $15-$20
    Topps $5-$10
  • CDsNutsCDsNuts Posts: 10,092 ✭
    Based on my experience, less than .5% of the cards graded by PSA are wrongly labeled. That's really not that bad.
  • jomerjomer Posts: 254
    "Based on my experience, less than .5% of the cards graded by PSA are wrongly labeled. That's really not that bad."

    It is bad, because the 5% ..... frequent this board



    image
  • RedHeart54RedHeart54 Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭
    PSA needs to hire a Canadian- ANY Canadian- to manage the hockey cards that come in. I've seen several mislabeled Topps/OPC cards but the worst was a 1980 Topps "scratched" Gretzky that was holdered PSA 8 NQ...until now.

    Try THIS out for size. It's one of the key cards of 1950s hockey and they couldn't get the year right. It should be labeled 1957.

    Frank Mahovlich rookie card

    I'm surprised even Bill Goodwin failed to mention the error in the description. (But yes, the buyer knew hence the $1085 sale price.)
Sign In or Register to comment.