I gotta say the one on the left. It only looks dark because it's compared against a really bright example. Always go for the centering - maybe even bumpable
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
You guys are all crazy, the one on the right has so much more eye appeal its silly. It is a pack fresh looking card, the other looks like it has been sitting in someones card store display case under for 30 years in direct sunlight. Also look at the top bottom centering and the left card definately is short causing it to appear better centered then the one on the right. The card on the right is pretty well centered and with that bright fresh color and gloss it is the card to me.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
<< <i>You guys are all crazy, the one on the right has so much more eye appeal its silly. It is a pack fresh looking card, the other looks like it has been sitting in someones card store display case under for 30 years in direct sunlight. Also look at the top bottom centering and the left card definately is short causing it to appear better centered then the one on the right. The card on the right is pretty well centered and with that bright fresh color and gloss it is the card to me. >>
I agree. Clean white card....or old looking card....hmmm?
Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards. Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Gotta agree with the right one. Much whiter. Sure the one one the left has better centering, but only slightly. The right one has great eye appeal.
Edited to add: It looks like the corners are about the same. So it comes down to a decision. Would you rather have a card with only SLIGHTLY better centering, or would you rather have a card that is MUCH whiter, cleaner?
When I was just barely growin pubes, I started collecting coins. Yeah, the first few months, I'd make my pennies prettier by rubbing chicken grease on them.
No kidding.
After about a year, I came to understand what foreign substances can do to coins, how to properly store and care for coins, and all that jazz.
I pulled those penny albums and tubes from those "early days" out of the closet. Man, you should've seen how rusty and degraded they were! The chicken grease ate away layers of metal in less than a year! Obviously, not much money invested in that bunch, but I did come to discover I ruined a couple early 1900's pennies that were worth about $20-$30 each in their pre-Chicken condition.
Doh!
Not related, but I soon came to HATE collecting coins. I think my problem was they ALL basically looked the same, aside from dates and mint marks. Looking back, my focus should've been on collecting single beautiful examples instead of contiguous runs.
Anyway, I bet chicken grease would make cards look great too! Especially the foil ones.
Keep left if you plan to sell it at some point. If it's going to sit in your personal collection and you're not a stickler for centering, the one on the right has much more eye/display appeal.
<< <i>So has anyone decided why the one of the left is shorter?
Is it possible a trimmed card made it into a PSA slab?
Or is that series known to have shorter cards?
I still like the one on the left.
Steve >>
Steve - I've done a lot, a lot, of scanning on perhaps around five different scanners I've had, plus on some friend's scanners, and they all have their crazy idiosyncrasis. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the OP reversed the cards in the scan, and then the "whiter" card looked a little shorter.
Also, I'm not an expert on Bowman football and don't even own any, but it wouldn't surprise me if their factory cuts on this issue might be a little off from time to time.
Comments
A stickler for centering might penalize the right card at sale time.
I guess I would still keep the one on the right.
John
edit thread
left
MULLINS5,1966CUDA,nam812,nightcrawler,OAKESY25,PowderedH2O,relaxed,RonBurgundy,samsgirl214,shagrotn77,swartz1,slantycouch,Statman,Wabittwax
My Podcast - Now FEATURED on iTunes
Steve
Steve
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
both very nice though
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
<< <i>You guys are all crazy, the one on the right has so much more eye appeal its silly. It is a pack fresh looking card, the other looks like it has been sitting in someones card store display case under for 30 years in direct sunlight. Also look at the top bottom centering and the left card definately is short causing it to appear better centered then the one on the right. The card on the right is pretty well centered and with that bright fresh color and gloss it is the card to me. >>
I agree. Clean white card....or old looking card....hmmm?
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Edited to add: It looks like the corners are about the same. So it comes down to a decision. Would you rather have a card with only SLIGHTLY better centering, or would you rather have a card that is MUCH whiter, cleaner?
<< <i>I like the Left card better, but I dunno now after Lee posted those red laser lines. lol >>
I'm Nick.
mosaic's Nolan Ryan Basic Topps registry set
mosaic's Big 3 Nolan Ryan Run Showcase
No kidding.
After about a year, I came to understand what foreign substances can do to coins, how to properly store and care for coins, and all that jazz.
I pulled those penny albums and tubes from those "early days" out of the closet. Man, you should've seen how rusty and degraded they were! The chicken grease ate away layers of metal in less than a year! Obviously, not much money invested in that bunch, but I did come to discover I ruined a couple early 1900's pennies that were worth about $20-$30 each in their pre-Chicken condition.
Doh!
Not related, but I soon came to HATE collecting coins. I think my problem was they ALL basically looked the same, aside from dates and mint marks. Looking back, my focus should've been on collecting single beautiful examples instead of contiguous runs.
Anyway, I bet chicken grease would make cards look great too! Especially the foil ones.
mosaic's Nolan Ryan Basic Topps registry set
mosaic's Big 3 Nolan Ryan Run Showcase
Much nicer centering and the black border is tight!
PoppaJ
Is it possible a trimmed card made it into a PSA slab?
Or is that series known to have shorter cards?
I still like the one on the left.
Steve
<< <i>So has anyone decided why the one of the left is shorter?
Is it possible a trimmed card made it into a PSA slab?
Or is that series known to have shorter cards?
I still like the one on the left.
Steve >>
Steve - I've done a lot, a lot, of scanning on perhaps around five different scanners I've had, plus on some friend's scanners, and they all have their crazy idiosyncrasis. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the OP reversed the cards in the scan, and then the "whiter" card looked a little shorter.
Also, I'm not an expert on Bowman football and don't even own any, but it wouldn't surprise me if their factory cuts on this issue might be a little off from time to time.
<< <i>
<< <i>I like the Left card better, but I dunno now after Lee posted those red laser lines. lol >>
I'm Nick. >>
I thought you were Gary. I'm confused.
<< <i>
<< <i>I like the Left card better, but I dunno now after Lee posted those red laser lines. lol >>
I'm Nick. >>
classic