Does this 1958 Topps Jim Brown look trimmed or just miscut?

thenavarro · September 26, 2008 11:30AM

I am considering buying this 1958 Topps Jim Brown to get signed for my HOF signed rookie collection. Wanted to get a few opinions as to if it looks trimmed or if its just miscut?

thanks,

Mike

rube26105 · September 26, 2008 11:44AM

i say mc, i see a little bit of red from the other card in the right top side me thinks?

VitoCo1972 · September 26, 2008 11:47AM

I would say miscut - although the bottom border would be the questionable one if I had to choose.

thenavarro · September 26, 2008 11:58AM

Ok, thanks for the opinions guys. I just went ahead and bought it. I'll be sending it to Brown's next show to join my signed rookie collection. I like that it's crease free, I can deal with the OC/MC.

Mike

Mphilking · September 26, 2008 12:03PM

Here is mine. I'm embarassed I still have it in a wrinkled up sleeve, but it's not trimmed. Hope it helps some.

bobbyw8469 · September 27, 2008 1:06PM

I hope you didn't pay $125 for that miscut/trimmed Brown.....

thenavarro · September 27, 2008 1:14PM

<< <i>I hope you didn't pay $125 for that miscut/trimmed Brown..... >>

Nope, I paid about $150.00 for it.

I like crease free more than I like centering and I had some extra money sitting in my paypal account from those Microsoft Cashback freebies, so in essence, Bill Gates bought it for me

I'm sure I probably could have done better, but patience is not my friend and my time searching is worth a lot more to me than $50 bucks or so.

Mike

Does this 1958 Topps Jim Brown look trimmed or just miscut?

Comments