Does this card look like a PSA 10?

1989 Donruss BB Tram PSA 10???
Does the Trammell card pictured look like a gem mint card to anyone here? It looks like it has 3 bum corners.
Does the Trammell card pictured look like a gem mint card to anyone here? It looks like it has 3 bum corners.
0
Comments
none of those cards look like 10's
PoppaJ
But hey! They'll get 10s! Well, if I included them with 4SC's sub they would.
<< <i>I hate to be the ignorant guy here, but I am just getting back into this hobby after years off, and am looking to not make stupid buying mistakes. >>
Plain and simple, closely inspect any scan of any card you are considering buying from 4SC. I'm not saying they don't deserve a little extra love from PSA. If I submited 2500 cards a month, I would expect a little break every now then too. But like I said, this has been a common thread topic on here and it is almost always regarding a PSA 10 being sold by them.
ever wonder how much of this junk is pumped into the hobby everyday?
this should be like that credit card commercial
"Whats in YOUR wallet?"
only it should say
"Whats in YOUR set registery?"
Where is the integrity ?
Go ahead and give them breaks ... YOU are the one ending up with this card
This is what set registry has done.
Its flooded the market with JUNK!
Run out of quality cards to grade?
Lets start grading commons, and sell them for big bucks!
Just another reason to by the card and not the grade... but who cares if you just want it for your registry set.
Keeping some cards off the registry until sold, will certainly bring more money at auction.
Does PSA help them out in that regard also?
<< <i>but who cares if you just want it for your registry set. >>
WOW!
<< <i>It's also given a boost to the unopened material market. >>
Why bother with expensive unopened material.
FOUR SHARP NOTHING goes arounds school yards, plucking cards off bike spokes, and has been submitting THOSE for gemmies
:-)
There are a ton of 4SC cards in my set. Not that I love them or anything, but they sure grade the cards I like. They do charge WAY too much for shipping, but that's about the only thing bad I can say about them. Their customer service (in MY experience) is perfect. I really don't think they catch any breaks on grading. You're talking about the integrity of PSA, which I'm sure most of you are about falling out of your chair when you see PSA and integrity in the same sentence, but PSA is supposed to be the most respected grading service in the industry. By talking crap about them, that only makes your own cards worth less.
<< <i>The Set Registry was the greatest idea PSA ever had. How many hundreds of thousands of commons have been graded because of it? >>
How friggin true was that statement. I just submitted a 1983 Topps Bill Caudill because there are currently no 10's on the pop report.
BUT
4sc, nesports, & those other mega-volume sellers get my business. a giant majority of my raw sets has come from these cats, and a giant majority of the cards have been at very reasonable discounts.
J
RIP GURU
<< <i>Those Donruss Baseball's Best sets were wrapped tight in cellophane and PSA has always allowed for rounded (crushed actually) corners. Here's one from 1990: Link >>
Now I'm not sure about THAT one... I sent in a McGwire Donruss Rookies once, which is card #1 in a tightly wrapped cello), and I got no love on it. It was the sharpest one I had, and it came back a 6.
-Claude
<< <i>OK, you're right. I have no idea what I'm talking about. I've only opened about 19,000 of these sets and submitted thousands of cards from them. I'm sure your one McGwire card from a completely different set is a more accurate sample size. >>
Calm down Gary.
Sorry this happened to you.
thanks for the laughs
j
RIP GURU
There was a PSA 10 1956 Topps Yogi Berra in the last Mile High Cards auction that was off-center, and there's another vintage PSA 10 in their current auction that is also slightly off-center.
Here is what I remember ...
PSA 9 ... Has to appear perfect to the naked eye & centering 60/40 or better
PSA 10 ... no flaws, even with using a 10X magnifying glass & centering 50/50 (Thus making it a GEM)
is the 10X magnifying glass out of the grading process ?
<< <i>OK, you're right. I have no idea what I'm talking about. I've only opened about 19,000 of these sets and submitted thousands of cards from them. I'm sure your one McGwire card from a completely different set is a more accurate sample size. >>
lol, ouch
I know I could have phrased that a little different, I didn't mean it to sound like that.
That was a funny reaction though, I'm sorry this happened to me.
What is the registry?
Who is alan trammell?
j
RIP GURU
<< <i>Now I'm not sure about THAT one... I sent in a McGwire Donruss Rookies once, which is card #1 in a tightly wrapped cello), and I got no love on it. It was the sharpest one I had, and it came back a 6. >>
There had to have been something else wrong with it, like a hidden wrinkle. The 87 Donruss boxed sets seem to have been wrapped tighter than most, resulting in slight surface wrinkles over time.
I've submitted plenty of Donruss factory set and boxed set cards in the few years that I've been submitting, and if the corner is slightly factory-rounded but the surface is still intact under magnification, then the grade is not harmed. If there's any flaking, chipping, or denting, then the grade gets harmed.
Now... this 89 D BB card, the lower right corner looks excessivly rounded, almost dinged. Maybe the scan looks worse that the card itself?
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>I've submitted plenty of Donruss factory set and boxed set cards in the few years that I've been submitting, and if the corner is slightly factory-rounded but the surface is still intact under magnification, then the grade is not harmed. If there's any flaking, chipping, or denting, then the grade gets harmed. >>
That has been my experience with submitting cards from Donruss factory sets as well - primarily '87.
I know I could have phrased that a little different, I didn't mean it to sound like that.
That was a funny reaction though, I'm sorry this happened to me.
Sorry, I was a little hungover this morning. Someone needs to shoot me in the balls.
<< <i>Sorry, I was a little hungover this morning. Someone needs to shoot me in the balls. >>
Maybe a gang of teenage karate students on dirtbikes should run you off the road and down a steep hill and make you throw your bicycle in the dumpster.