Advice if you're buying or selling at the National
I just ran across this economics experiment (conducted by John List currently at the Univ of Chicago). It was conducted in 2002-2003, but it's pretty darn interesting. He found people at a card show who were shopping for (or selling) a 1989 UD Griffey PSA 9. He then asked them to negotiate with dealers for the card. Since most dealers (obnoxiously) don't put prices on cards, he wanted to see if the prices differed according the race and sex of the customer. Here's what he found (prices are averaged over lots of transactions):
For White Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 108.75
Final Price: 100.35
For White Females (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 119.41
Final Price: 106.98
For Nonwhite Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 113.50
Final Price: 104.25
For White Males (aged 60+)
Inital Price: 120.58
Final Price: 107.33
How about when they were selling instead of buying?
For White Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 38.06
Final Offer: 42.05
For White Females (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 26.64
Final Offer: 33.99
For Nonwhite Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 26.47
Final Offer: 33.52
For White Males (aged 60+)
Inital Offer: 29.34
Final Offer: 35.16
Advice for nondealers: Whether you're buying or selling, you should dress as a young white male.
Advice for dealers: You should buy from young nonwhite males and sell to old white guys.
For White Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 108.75
Final Price: 100.35
For White Females (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 119.41
Final Price: 106.98
For Nonwhite Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Price: 113.50
Final Price: 104.25
For White Males (aged 60+)
Inital Price: 120.58
Final Price: 107.33
How about when they were selling instead of buying?
For White Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 38.06
Final Offer: 42.05
For White Females (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 26.64
Final Offer: 33.99
For Nonwhite Males (aged 20-30)
Initial Offer: 26.47
Final Offer: 33.52
For White Males (aged 60+)
Inital Offer: 29.34
Final Offer: 35.16
Advice for nondealers: Whether you're buying or selling, you should dress as a young white male.
Advice for dealers: You should buy from young nonwhite males and sell to old white guys.
0
Comments
Results are not illogical.
<< <i>Advice for dealers: You should buy from young nonwhite males and sell to old white guys. >>
I'm dead.
- John Wooden
Just a bunch of horsecarp made up to give the race baiters some information they could spin to make certain groups look like racists and other groups look like victims.
<< <i>Although I am sure there is some pattern behind this, the actual study is the typical type of nonsense colleges are promoting these days. It doesnt take into account the "eye appeal"/centering of the card, which could change the price, if the dealer they were selling it to did not already have one or had two dozen, if it was at the beginning of the show or the end, etc etc.
Just a bunch of horsecarp made up to give the race baiters some information they could spin to make certain groups look like racists and other groups look like victims. >>
not to mention the skill of the person to get the price he or she wanted.
http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/
<< <i>Although I am sure there is some pattern behind this, the actual study is the typical type of nonsense colleges are promoting these days. It doesnt take into account the "eye appeal"/centering of the card, which could change the price, if the dealer they were selling it to did not already have one or had two dozen, if it was at the beginning of the show or the end, etc etc.
Just a bunch of horsecarp made up to give the race baiters some information they could spin to make certain groups look like racists and other groups look like victims. >>
And your response is the typical nonsense that demonstrates why good education is so important. Those patterns emerged from hundreds of transactions. Your "alternative explanations" would only make sense if white males, for example, were more likely to look for Griffeys with less eye appeal (and therefore a lower price) than were those in the other groups. This makes no sense. The same is true for your other "explanations." In the full article List also addresses several other legitimate alternative explanations that you're too dense to even imagine. You're doing a great job of confusing "random error" and "systematic error". I cover these in Research Methods 101. You fail.
As for negotiation skill, that could explain the final offer/price, but not the initial offer/price.
Sorry for the hostility, but good educators hate ignorance.
JT
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
<< <i>Don't people between 30-60 buy cards? Did the individuals involved in this study have preconceived ideas and set out to get results they already believed? They could easily do this by having the groups act as I have described each group. By the way I hate it when cards are not priced. I do not like to be "sized up" and taken advantage of. >>
Question 1: Yes
Question 2: That's a very good question and that's why this study was much better than other similar ones. The people didn't know what the study was really about. List just asked them to go out and get the best deal they could. I think they were offered prizes for getting the best deal to convince them that it was only an economics experiment about getting the best deal.