When it comes to card condition, what matters most to you?

Because I collect cards primarily for their visual appeal, centering is what matters most to me. I will always take a well-centered card with a imperfect corners over an off-center card with perfect corners.
0
Comments
Collector of Pittsburgh Pirates cards for a slightly less stupid reason.
My Pirates Collection
A nice rack, really. Anything else is just gravy.
I'd take a 60/40 card with 4 perfect corners over a 50/50 card with a dinged corner.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Corners
Color
Surface
Focus
<< <i>99% of the time centering...the only card I have made the exception on is my jackie rookie. I have had much better centered ones, but it is TRULY hard to find one thats clean as this one. >>
That's a great looking 4! With the yellow background, the centering doesn't detract much at all from the eye appeal.
I generally care most about centering, too, but it depends on the card. hofautos's Robinson cards are a good example of a card being much nicer than a better-centered card in the same grade.
Of the major faults, I think a light crease is actually the least detracting. Ironically that's the one PSA hammers the hardest.
Vintage Football Card Gallery
Centering l-r being the most important
Focus
color
gloss
print defects
I do however, insist on PSA 7's for all cards from 1973-77 that are worth $8 or more in the Beckett Almanac. For 1970-72 (I'll start them in full earnest in early September) I want all HOFers and checklists in PSA 7. Then when I'm ready for 1960s sets, I'll go with PSA 6 HOFers/checklists.
D's: 50P,49S,45D+S,43D,41S,40D,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 241,435,610,654 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
<< <i>99% of the time centering...the only card I have made the exception on is my jackie rookie. I have had much better centered ones, but it is TRULY hard to find one thats clean as this one.
How is this possible? The right Jackie looks like only a 2 (AT BEST). OTOH, the left one could've gotten a 5 on a good day.
D's: 50P,49S,45D+S,43D,41S,40D,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 241,435,610,654 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
<< <i>
<< <i>99% of the time centering...the only card I have made the exception on is my jackie rookie. I have had much better centered ones, but it is TRULY hard to find one thats clean as this one.
How is this possible? The right Jackie looks like only a 2 (AT BEST). OTOH, the left one could've gotten a 5 on a good day. >>
Most of Jackies are stained or discolored or ink runs...the jackie on the right is a VERY typical 4. There is a slight surface wrinkle on mine, which is why the 4, otherwise, I am sure it would be at least a 5.
I am mostly into 50/60s if they look as good as this example I am satisfied.
A card severely OF can be worse the OC.
Generally though, centering has always been my top priority.
Steve
Robert
http://richsbaseball.webs.com
Very true. I look at some of the cards I bought 20 - 30 years ago, thinking they were mint, and the centering would fall within the PSA 6 to 7 guidelines. My guess is that with the importance placed on centering by the grading companies (PSA & SGC), back in the early 90's, the market has been manipulated to value centering more than other criteria.
This is about the off-center limit for me:
For newer cards, I expect them to be around NRMT-MT.