Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Do you think this auto looks funny?

metalmikemetalmike Posts: 2,152 ✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Ugly card and uglier auto
USN 1977-1987 * ALL cards are commons unless auto'd. Buying Britneycards. NWO for life.

Comments

  • torctorc Posts: 341
    Your right, Both are ugly
    he looks like he is on drugs,
    image
  • TNTonPMSTNTonPMS Posts: 2,279 ✭✭
    It looks like he just got done smokin a big fat jizoint
  • metalmikemetalmike Posts: 2,152 ✭✭
    That auto is fugly too.
    USN 1977-1987 * ALL cards are commons unless auto'd. Buying Britneycards. NWO for life.
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    pete must've been getting ready for a big jefferson airplane show after photographs.

    he just started getting his mind right a little early....

    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • HighChopperHighChopper Posts: 1,091
    image
    There's a hole in my head where the rain comes in.
  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,253 ✭✭✭
    Now, I enjoy having autos on rookies and other vintage but to put it on a nice 69 Super is just crazy! Maybe it has a wrinkle then it may be kind of cool.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I prefer not to have auto's on any card that already has a facsimile of one.

    I understand those that collect auto's on rookie cards have no choice sometimes.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • FrodoBagginsFrodoBaggins Posts: 60
    It looks exactly like what it is....a card signed by Rose that's smaller than a regular card, therefore making his signature smaller and more compressed
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Frodo I'm not sure I understand you. Are you saying 1969 Topps supers are smaller then the regular issue 1969's?


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • FrodoBagginsFrodoBaggins Posts: 60


    << <i>Frodo I'm not sure I understand you. Are you saying 1969 Topps supers are smaller then the regular issue 1969's?


    Steve >>



    Yeah, unless I'm mistaken. I remember one issue from the late '60's-early '70's that were smaller than the standard 3.5"x2.5" cards. Similar size as Deckle Edges
  • jay0791jay0791 Posts: 3,576 ✭✭✭✭
    Doesn't look like any pete rose auto I have.
    Caption on the card should read....."AWE.......... yeah.............. sparky...I do have a hangover."
    thats when he must have signed it.

    Reminds me of my eddie mathews ball......he had his bottle underneath the table...and by the end of the show his auto was drifting all over the place. On mine...lucky he didn't cross the threads from the sweet spot.
    Collecting PSA... FB,BK,HK,and BB HOF RC sets
    1948-76 Topps FB Sets
    FB & BB HOF Player sets
    1948-1993 NY Yankee Team Sets
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    This 66 card set featured larger versions, (2-1/4" X 3-1/4") of the regular issue cards and were High Gloss cards. A test issue, only distributed in Michigan, these are extremly rare!


    According to someone on the net.

    I have no idea how rare they are but I was always under the impression they were larger then the standard issue card.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The autograph looks like Pete could've been signing it in a crowd (say after a game), and in the middle of him signing his last name, someone bumped his right hand and caused him to garble it image


    Steve
Sign In or Register to comment.