new raw pete roses

donrus · June 9, 2008 12:11PM

do you the resident experts think i should send them in??

would you just sell them and start over?

i did just buy the 68 in psa 8.. but i do need the others. i love the starline sticker i think its a 1969? please correct me! the 1969 batting leaders card i would love to find one in a 8(but this is the best i have came acroos lately. the 1971 is just tough to find anything decent. i thought this one looked pretty good (oc a bit) i know they grade those ones hard too. the 1970 sporting news i really need a better on e i think, again this is the best raw i could find after spending several dollars.. i am looking for the 70 batting leaders..
anyway i would like your opions on these if i should just send them in and take a chance? what do you think they will grade? thanks for your time.... don russell

OAKESY25 · June 9, 2008 12:15PM

I believe the starline sticker is a 1983 reprint of and 67 dexter press issue..
and psa does not grade them anymore
the 68 and 71 are worth grading

metalmike · June 9, 2008 12:21PM

Don I an not 100% sure but I remember something about the starline stickers being a fan/bogus issue. I have one myself. Can anybody with a big book help a old man out?

donrus · June 9, 2008 12:39PM

it really looks old though..lol don

lsutigers1973 · June 9, 2008 1:23PM

The 71 is too far OC L/R. The 68 may be worth grading but they are hard to judge in person let alone from a scan.

TNP777 · June 9, 2008 1:35PM

Before the inevitable sarcastic reply by one of the local Pujols fanclub,

for your daily Pete Rose thread. I say keep 'em coming - I'm no Rose apologist, but you always post interesting cards with legitimate questions and observations.

firedawg45 · June 17, 2008 8:30AM

don, psa dosent grade the starline stickers fyi. i agree the 71 possible 7 as with the 68. 6 or lower on the other 2. corey-currently third on the rose master

new raw pete roses

Comments