Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Has the 1971 Topps Munson ALWAYS Been 1) Highly Sought After; and 2) Worth More Than The 1970 Topps?

Just an esoteric hobby question here, but has the 1971 Topps Munson always been a highly sought after card? Been "worth" more than the 1970 Topps Munson. We all know that typically a rookie card is worth more than a 2nd, 3rd, etc., year card. But the 1971 Topps Munson is a clear exception to this "rule." Did the 1971 Munson skyrocket in price only after the advent of grading and people started to realize that a PSA 8 or PSA 9 1971 Munson was quite rare?

Other than the 1970 and 1971 Topps Munson, are there any examples of 2nd, 3rd year cards being more valuable than rookie cards? Thanks.

/s/ JackWESQ
image

Comments

  • Brian48Brian48 Posts: 2,624 ✭✭✭
    Prior to grading, the '72 Garvey (hi-number) was always priced higher than his '71 rookie. Now it's the reverse, provided that it's a high-grade.
  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,602 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Prior to grading, the '72 Garvey (hi-number) was always priced higher than his '71 rookie...... >>



    That is driven by the fact that the 72 is in the high series.
  • SDavidSDavid Posts: 1,584 ✭✭
    Favre's second year SC card is worth more than his rookie.
  • paleocardspaleocards Posts: 942 ✭✭✭✭
    An example of a HOFer non-RC being more valuable than his rookie: 1966 Topps #598 Gaylord Perry (last card in the set) vs. his 1962 RC.

    $160 vs. $95 in PSA 7


  • << <i>An example of a HOFer non-RC being more valuable than his rookie: 1966 Topps #598 Gaylord Perry (last card in the set) vs. his 1962 RC.

    $160 vs. $95 in PSA 7 >>



    Result of being the last card as well as a high number. Same reason the 1st card in a set is usually hard to find in great shape affects the last card.
  • DrJDrJ Posts: 2,213
    1952 Topps Mantle worth much much more than a 1951 Bowman.
  • Whenever the rookie is a multiplayer card, the 2nd year card (3rd year card in case of niekro who had 2 multiplayer cards before his "solo rookie")is usually more sought after....and sometimes more expensive. I know I personally collect the 2nd year cards where the players first card is a multiplayer card. This is especially true for the munson though because of the tough borders. It has always been quite a bit more expensive but has shot up even more over the years as it has become considered a "classic" card by many....and it truly is deserving of that title...sweet card.

    I wish i didn't sell my 8 when I did...it's almost too crazy expensive to buy now...

    image

  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,179 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For a long time, the 1970 Topps Johnny Bench, by virtue of it being in the rarer high series, was worth a lot more than his 1968 rookie card.


    Steve
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    I've got a copy of the September 1989 Beckett.

    1970 Topps Thurman Munson = $40
    1971 Topps Thurman Munson = $18




    << <i>An example of a HOFer non-RC being more valuable than his rookie: 1966 Topps #598 Gaylord Perry (last card in the set) vs. his 1962 RC.

    $160 vs. $95 in PSA 7 >>



    Welllll.... when you look at PSA 8s, his 1962 rookie sells for twice as much as a 1966 PSA 8.



    I remember that some 2nd year cards in 1992 Bowman were more desirable than their rookie counterparts from 1991 (Pedro, I-Rod, Mondesi, Chipper).
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • HoofHeartedHoofHearted Posts: 2,537 ✭✭


    << <i>It has always been quite a bit more expensive but has shot up even more over the years as it has become considered a "classic" card by many....and it truly is deserving of that title...sweet card. >>



    I considered this a classic card and was fortunate to have one offered for sale by one of the board members here -- I forget who -- but it's always on display on my card shelves! It's got a teeny-tiny crease in the picture that doesn't detract from the image at all. I love this card!

    image
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    Ahh, a 1994 Tuff Stuff...


    1989 Fleer Albert Belle = $3.50
    1990 Leaf Albert Belle = $17.00

    1990 Upper Deck Juan Gonzalez = $7.50
    1991 Ultra Update Juan Gonzalez = $20

    1991 Bowman Raul Mondesi = $2.50
    1992 Bowman Raul Mondesi = $18.00

    1991 Bowman Tim Salmon = $2.00
    1992 Fleer Update Tim Salmon = $35.00 (!!!!)

    1991 Bowman Kenny Lofton = $1.50
    1992 Fleer Update Kenny Lofton = $20.00



    Heh... anyone have a time machine?

    1993 SP Derek Jeter = $4.00
    1994 SP Alex Rodriguez = $2.00
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
  • fattymacsfattymacs Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭
    I'm with hofautos, The only multi player rookie card I like is Johnny Bench. I like the 71 Munson and 64 Rose much better than the multi-player rookie cards. I'm a big Rose fan and I wouldn't have one of his rookie cards up my butt if I had room for 2 of them.
  • HoofHeartedHoofHearted Posts: 2,537 ✭✭


    << <i>I'm with hofautos, The only multi player rookie card I like is Johnny Bench. I like the 71 Munson and 64 Rose much better than the multi-player rookie cards. I'm a big Rose fan and I wouldn't have one of his rookie cards up my butt if I had room for 2 of them. >>



    I just had my Bench rookie graded -- came back an 8!

    image
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    I kinda like the multi rookie cards. They have to share with the scrubs, because they hadn't earned their stripes yet.
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25


  • << <i>I'm with hofautos, The only multi player rookie card I like is Johnny Bench. I like the 71 Munson and 64 Rose much better than the multi-player rookie cards. I'm a big Rose fan and I wouldn't have one of his rookie cards up my butt if I had room for 2 of them. >>



    Yea...a few more examples...

    imageimage
    imageimage
  • fattymacsfattymacs Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭
    The 66 Tony Perez is another good example.
  • nightcrawlernightcrawler Posts: 5,110 ✭✭
    I'm not to big on that Pete Rose rc, them guys look like they got their heads sticking outta the sand, lol.

    The 71 Munson is one of the greatest ever cards IMO.


  • << <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>


    Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)

    SOLO ROOKIES
    1964 rose
    1964 stargell
    1966 niekro
    1966 morgan
    1966 catfish jim hunter
    1966 perez
    1967 carlton
    1967 jenkins
    1967 sutton
    1968 seaver
    1968 carew
    1969 nolan
    1970 rollie
    1973 fisk
    1974 schmidt
    1976 jim rice
    1976 carter
    1979 molitor
  • SDSportsFanSDSportsFan Posts: 5,179 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>


    Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)

    SOLO ROOKIES
    1964 rose
    1964 stargell
    1966 niekro
    1966 morgan
    1966 catfish jim hunter
    1966 perez
    1967 carlton
    1967 jenkins
    1967 sutton
    1968 seaver
    1968 carew
    1969 nolan
    1970 rollie
    1973 fisk
    1974 schmidt
    1976 jim rice
    1976 carter
    1979 molitor >>




    Don't forget Johnny Bench and Cal Ripken Jr.image

    Steve
  • GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭
    I'm on record agreeing w/ hofautos about second year cards. The ones illustrated here make the case nicely (I love that Morgan card.) It's always a nice bonus if your guy had a solid rookie season and has a Topps Rookie Team trophy, like Joe, Johnny and Pete. Perez has one, so do Carew, Seaver and Fisk.


  • << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>


    Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)

    SOLO ROOKIES
    1964 rose
    1964 stargell
    1966 niekro
    1966 morgan
    1966 catfish jim hunter
    1966 perez
    1967 carlton
    1967 jenkins
    1967 sutton
    1968 seaver
    1968 carew
    1969 nolan
    1970 rollie
    1973 fisk
    1974 schmidt
    1976 jim rice
    1976 carter
    1979 molitor >>




    Don't forget Johnny Bench and Cal Ripken Jr.image

    Steve >>


    whoops missed bench, but ripken already has the 82 traded rookie..


  • << <i>I'm on record agreeing w/ hofautos about second year cards. The ones illustrated here make the case nicely (I love that Morgan card.) It's always a nice bonus if your guy had a solid rookie season and has a Topps Rookie Team trophy, like Joe, Johnny and Pete. Perez has one, so do Carew, Seaver and Fisk. >>



    BTW, FYI - the last psa 8 66 morgan sold for $255 and the last psa 8 65 morgan sold for $130
  • GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭
    Joe actually has one of the better looking multiplayer rookies (for what that's worth.) The Colt .45's hat and Sonny Jackson's uncanny resemblence to Chris Rock add visual appeal to it.

    I kind of like the Jenkins rookie, too. But I prefer his superb '67 "solo rookie" (I'm going to start using that image )
Sign In or Register to comment.