Has the 1971 Topps Munson ALWAYS Been 1) Highly Sought After; and 2) Worth More Than The 1970 Topps?

Just an esoteric hobby question here, but has the 1971 Topps Munson always been a highly sought after card? Been "worth" more than the 1970 Topps Munson. We all know that typically a rookie card is worth more than a 2nd, 3rd, etc., year card. But the 1971 Topps Munson is a clear exception to this "rule." Did the 1971 Munson skyrocket in price only after the advent of grading and people started to realize that a PSA 8 or PSA 9 1971 Munson was quite rare?
Other than the 1970 and 1971 Topps Munson, are there any examples of 2nd, 3rd year cards being more valuable than rookie cards? Thanks.
/s/ JackWESQ
Other than the 1970 and 1971 Topps Munson, are there any examples of 2nd, 3rd year cards being more valuable than rookie cards? Thanks.
/s/ JackWESQ

0
Comments
<< <i>Prior to grading, the '72 Garvey (hi-number) was always priced higher than his '71 rookie...... >>
That is driven by the fact that the 72 is in the high series.
$160 vs. $95 in PSA 7
<< <i>An example of a HOFer non-RC being more valuable than his rookie: 1966 Topps #598 Gaylord Perry (last card in the set) vs. his 1962 RC.
$160 vs. $95 in PSA 7 >>
Result of being the last card as well as a high number. Same reason the 1st card in a set is usually hard to find in great shape affects the last card.
I wish i didn't sell my 8 when I did...it's almost too crazy expensive to buy now...
Steve
1970 Topps Thurman Munson = $40
1971 Topps Thurman Munson = $18
<< <i>An example of a HOFer non-RC being more valuable than his rookie: 1966 Topps #598 Gaylord Perry (last card in the set) vs. his 1962 RC.
$160 vs. $95 in PSA 7 >>
Welllll.... when you look at PSA 8s, his 1962 rookie sells for twice as much as a 1966 PSA 8.
I remember that some 2nd year cards in 1992 Bowman were more desirable than their rookie counterparts from 1991 (Pedro, I-Rod, Mondesi, Chipper).
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>It has always been quite a bit more expensive but has shot up even more over the years as it has become considered a "classic" card by many....and it truly is deserving of that title...sweet card. >>
I considered this a classic card and was fortunate to have one offered for sale by one of the board members here -- I forget who -- but it's always on display on my card shelves! It's got a teeny-tiny crease in the picture that doesn't detract from the image at all. I love this card!
1989 Fleer Albert Belle = $3.50
1990 Leaf Albert Belle = $17.00
1990 Upper Deck Juan Gonzalez = $7.50
1991 Ultra Update Juan Gonzalez = $20
1991 Bowman Raul Mondesi = $2.50
1992 Bowman Raul Mondesi = $18.00
1991 Bowman Tim Salmon = $2.00
1992 Fleer Update Tim Salmon = $35.00 (!!!!)
1991 Bowman Kenny Lofton = $1.50
1992 Fleer Update Kenny Lofton = $20.00
Heh... anyone have a time machine?
1993 SP Derek Jeter = $4.00
1994 SP Alex Rodriguez = $2.00
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>I'm with hofautos, The only multi player rookie card I like is Johnny Bench. I like the 71 Munson and 64 Rose much better than the multi-player rookie cards. I'm a big Rose fan and I wouldn't have one of his rookie cards up my butt if I had room for 2 of them. >>
I just had my Bench rookie graded -- came back an 8!
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i>I'm with hofautos, The only multi player rookie card I like is Johnny Bench. I like the 71 Munson and 64 Rose much better than the multi-player rookie cards. I'm a big Rose fan and I wouldn't have one of his rookie cards up my butt if I had room for 2 of them. >>
Yea...a few more examples...
The 71 Munson is one of the greatest ever cards IMO.
<< <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>
Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)
SOLO ROOKIES
1964 rose
1964 stargell
1966 niekro
1966 morgan
1966 catfish jim hunter
1966 perez
1967 carlton
1967 jenkins
1967 sutton
1968 seaver
1968 carew
1969 nolan
1970 rollie
1973 fisk
1974 schmidt
1976 jim rice
1976 carter
1979 molitor
<< <i>
<< <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>
Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)
SOLO ROOKIES
1964 rose
1964 stargell
1966 niekro
1966 morgan
1966 catfish jim hunter
1966 perez
1967 carlton
1967 jenkins
1967 sutton
1968 seaver
1968 carew
1969 nolan
1970 rollie
1973 fisk
1974 schmidt
1976 jim rice
1976 carter
1979 molitor >>
Don't forget Johnny Bench and Cal Ripken Jr.
Steve
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>The 66 Tony Perez is another good example. >>
Here's the complete list of hofers that share their rookie card (rice is on there because i still have hope, and rose is on there because he should be)
SOLO ROOKIES
1964 rose
1964 stargell
1966 niekro
1966 morgan
1966 catfish jim hunter
1966 perez
1967 carlton
1967 jenkins
1967 sutton
1968 seaver
1968 carew
1969 nolan
1970 rollie
1973 fisk
1974 schmidt
1976 jim rice
1976 carter
1979 molitor >>
Don't forget Johnny Bench and Cal Ripken Jr.
Steve >>
whoops missed bench, but ripken already has the 82 traded rookie..
<< <i>I'm on record agreeing w/ hofautos about second year cards. The ones illustrated here make the case nicely (I love that Morgan card.) It's always a nice bonus if your guy had a solid rookie season and has a Topps Rookie Team trophy, like Joe, Johnny and Pete. Perez has one, so do Carew, Seaver and Fisk. >>
BTW, FYI - the last psa 8 66 morgan sold for $255 and the last psa 8 65 morgan sold for $130
I kind of like the Jenkins rookie, too. But I prefer his superb '67 "solo rookie" (I'm going to start using that