Modern Certified Auto vs. Signature via mail or in person...

Here's an arguement that myself and some fellow collector friends recently got into. Some say that having a card with an auto on it, be it sticker or not, from a card company is better because it's certified from day one. Some say they'd rather get the auto in person or through the mail and then have it authenticated. Which would you prefer? I think there are good arguements for both sides. One side said that it's horrible to have to pay tons of money to rip open packs with no guarantee of finding something. The other side they hated to wait with no guarantee that the card would be sent back. Where do you stand? Thanks.
0
Comments
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
1) In Person
2) Certified Auto
3) TTM
4) Purchased from a seller
1996 Select Certified Mirror Gold Ozzie Smith
2006 Bowman Chrome Orange Refractor Chris Carpenter
if it is for your personal collection with no intentions or ever re-selling, then the IN PERSON,
If you are going to re-sell, then Hard Signed from the Card producer, followed by sticker (All graded of course)
I'd rather have it in person.
These silly sticker autos of today are annoying.
Personally I'd enjoy meeting some of the guys I collect, but I shouldn't expect a TTM to sell for what a trading card with a certified sig to sell for.
Ripken in the Minors * Ripken in the Minors Facebook Page
1.) In person
2.) TTM (gives more of a personal interaction)
3.) Certified Signature
For some guys the only way to go is purchasing or finding a certified issue. Now if you are looking to sell, some guys gotten TTM or In person are not worth the authentication fees, making their signatures tough to move.
J