Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Question: Should PSA Registry Sets Be Exempted From The Half-Point Scale

In order to help preserve the competitive and financial integrity of the PSA Registry Sets,
should all cards in the PSA Registry be forever exempted from the Half-Point Grading Scale?
Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.

Comments

  • Options
    OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    I dont know how you could do that or justify it..
  • Options
    bigfischebigfische Posts: 2,252 ✭✭
    No, PSA did it to make the registries resubmit, why would the exempt them?
    My baseball and MMA articles-
    http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/

    imagey
  • Options
    It wont hurt the 1968 to present sets since the top ones are all above 9.00 anyways.

    Looks like this move was being made to go after SGC and Beckett customers alone, and will only leave them pedaling backwards.
    They should have stayed happy with the market share they had.

    It will definately leave them looking like money grubbers.

    If I want to get screwed, SGC and Beckett dont charge me a membership fee.
  • Options
    spazzyspazzy Posts: 592 ✭✭
    This is a such a can of worms opened. I can not see anything but some more changes to be made. I know its about the money . I will let the dust settle.
  • Options
    ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    Isn't the whole point of this to try and get many of the registry cards resubmitted?
    image
  • Options
    what they could easily do is have the grade factor of a card with a half point grade rounded down to the nearest whole number so that the weighted averages of all the sets remain the same.

    so, "card weight" X "grade" would be the same for an 8.5 versus and a straight 8. This would eliminate the potential for someone creeping up in the set rankings with lots of +.5 cards.

    Mark B.

    Seeking primarily PSA graded pre-war "type" cards

    My PSA Registry Sets

    34 Goudey, 75 Topps Mini, Hall of Fame Complete Set, 1985 Topps Tiffany, Hall of Fame Players Complete Set
  • Options
    spazzyspazzy Posts: 592 ✭✭
    Its a mess....did they ask any collectors about this before?
  • Options
    storm888storm888 Posts: 11,701 ✭✭✭
    "This would eliminate the potential for someone creeping up in the set rankings with lots of +.5 cards."

    /////////////////////////////////

    That would eliminate the incentive for registry folks to resubmit.

    Not a bad thing; except for PSA.
    Folks Who Bite Get Bitten. Folks Who Don't Bite Get Eaten.
  • Options
    bigfischebigfische Posts: 2,252 ✭✭
    Well, according to the message they sent out, 7 and 7.5s are the same grade, the 7.5 is just a higher example of a 7. So, if that is indeed true, there should be no difference between 7 and a 7.5 on the registry. They should both be weighted the same, because they are both 7s, one is just a better 7. However, since PSA does not really mean that, there will be a difference in the registries and 7.5s will be worth more to a set than a 7 will, even though PSA is saying they are still both 7s in the grand scheme of things.

    It's just doublespeak.
    My baseball and MMA articles-
    http://sportsfansnews.com/author/andy-fischer/

    imagey
  • Options
    jradke4jradke4 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭
    please remember PSA is a company in business to make $$$$. not just to please collectors. though pissing off collectors/customers wont help them make $$$$$. but they probably figure that they have x amount of market share that they cant loose too many customers do to their already being the leading grading service.
    Packers Fan for Life
    Collecting:
    Brett Favre Master Set
    Favre Ticket Stubs
    Favre TD Reciever Autos
    Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
    Football HOF Rc's
Sign In or Register to comment.