Just pulled a sweet redemption
zep33
Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭
I know he's been having a rough time lately but I've been after his stuff all season.
This just made my night. Heard it takes foreven to get Upper Deck to fill the redemptions though
This was the 3rd and final box of Goudy I was gonna deal with too.
This just made my night. Heard it takes foreven to get Upper Deck to fill the redemptions though
This was the 3rd and final box of Goudy I was gonna deal with too.
0
Comments
* C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
* T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
* L. TIANT BASIC #1
* DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
* MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
* PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
* '65 DISNEYLAND #2
* '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
* '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1
WaltDisneyBoards
Upper Deck is known for failing to fulfill redemptions, instead opting to replace with other players. I had a chuckle this year at all of the Mark Texiera signed 8x10's they sent folks this past summer.
mosaic's Nolan Ryan Basic Topps registry set
mosaic's Big 3 Nolan Ryan Run Showcase
Pretty cool you don't have to mail it in.
ALOT once you get it!
Good Luck
Kevin
<< <i>besides the Tiger Woods and perhaps the Lebron that is one of the best pulls. These are on card too so that will make it worth ALOT once you get it! >>
Alot
Perhaps this common spelling error began because there does exist in English a word spelled “allot” which is a verb meaning to apportion or grant. The correct form, with “a” and “lot” separated by a space is perhaps not often encountered in print because formal writers usually use other expressions such as “a great deal,” “often,” etc.
You shouldn’t write “alittle” either. It’s “a little.”
That's a long road, if we start down it.
You're (your, yore) right, of course, but it would be such a hard task, teaching folks how to use this English language. I got me a big old Webster's unabridged, sitting here, on my desk. Dang near five inches thick. I crack it open about 2, 3 times a day, looking up stuff. I also got me one them old Hacker's manuals hereabouts, for looking up stuff and whatnot.
Carry on.
<< <i>Oh, Allen.
That's a long road, if we start down it.
You're (your, yore) right, of course, but it would be such a hard task, teaching folks how to use this English language. I got me a big old Webster's unabridged, sitting here, on my desk. Dang near five inches thick. I crack it open about 2, 3 times a day, looking up stuff. I also got me one them old Hacker's manuals hereabouts, for looking up stuff and whatnot.
Carry on. >>
Me is used in many constructions where strict grammarians prescribe I. This usage is indicative of the shrinking range of the nominative form: me began to replace I sometime around the 16th century largely because of the pressure of word order. I is now chiefly used as the subject of an immediately following verb. Me occurs in every other position: absolutely <who, me?>, emphatically <me too>, and after prepositions, conjunctions, and verbs, including be <come with me> <you're as big as me> <it's me>. Almost all usage books recognize the legitimacy of me in these positions, especially in speech; some recommend I in formal and especially written contexts after be and after as and than when the first term of the comparison is the subject of a verb.
Looking for Jonny Gomes cards, especially Triple Threads and printing plates. Will consider all cards, though. Got something? Contact me at c_u_l_1@yahoo.com
an answer on sportscards here!
Kevin
PS....The PR's might be on UD's website.
<< <i>I am joking around on a slow Friday evening. Not to be a d!(k or anything. Keep in mind that I am from WV and use the word "ain't" and "y'all" atleast a few times a day. >>
Allen, what are you gonna do with the NNOF now?
I've learned often here.
I've learned a good deal here.
and I've learned a whole bunch here.
It is cool though that you are a Red Sox fan and don't have to pay the rediculous amount for redemptions that probably won't get signed anyways. Congrats on the pull though!
<< <i>Me is used in many constructions where strict grammarians prescribe I. This usage is indicative of the shrinking range of the nominative form: me began to replace I sometime around the 16th century largely because of the pressure of word order. I is now chiefly used as the subject of an immediately following verb. Me occurs in every other position: absolutely <who, me?>, emphatically <me too>, and after prepositions, conjunctions, and verbs, including be <come with me> <you're as big as me> <it's me>. Almost all usage books recognize the legitimacy of me in these positions, especially in speech; some recommend I in formal and especially written contexts after be and after as and than when the first term of the comparison is the subject of a verb.
Well, yeah. I was taught that I is OK as the subject, but not as the object. In many instances, the subject is assumed. So, for instance, "Come with me" really means "You come with me" and "Who, me?" actually means "Who do you refer to, me?" and so on and so forth. That's not my primary concern, however.
I'd just like see elimination of "literally," since nearly no one uses it correctly.
I'd also like to see elimination of "push the envelope" since the true phrase "push the outside of the envelope" [see Tom Wolfe].
Allen is correct, however, in that there is no such thing as alot or alittle.
Come to think of it, I'd just be happy if people would figure out how to use the spell check. Hell, I'm happy anyway.
Congrats.
<< <i>Man, I swear to God, I don't think I know anyone who has as many great pulls as you Mr. Zep , Absolutely incredible !! >>
While this is completely true, I don't think I know anyone who rips as much product as he does either. What a life
I'm probably only rippin about 200 a week , unless I had a really great week and pick up a few premium boxes .
Mr. Zep got to be doin a G or better !
Hey if ya can swing it . . . .Rip away
<< <i>What is an ATUO?? >>
Japanese for "autograph" apparently...
Great pull! I have had some terrific experiences with UD redemptions in the past year. I've redeemed online and hunkered down for the formerly usual 6-8 month wait (at least) but have actually been receiving back cards within 4-6 weeks. I even got a Johan Santana auto/jersey in less than 7 days at one point. Don't lose ALL hope for a quick turnaround...just don't expect one!
<< <i>Allen, what are you gonna do with the NNOF now? >>
Sold on a second chance for just over $1,000
TNT- You may not bust that much wax, but I am sure you have a Ruth ball, and maybe a 52 Topps Mantle? Correct me if I am wrong. I would take those over bustin new wax every week anytime.
1939 { Team signed Yankee baseball }
1951 {Team signed Yankee baseball }
1958 {Team signed Yankee baseball }
And the monster of them all {1932 Team signed Yankee baseball}
But for some reason, I just have cruddy luck pullin really great cards .
I really have never seen pulls like Mr. Zeps, I'm thinkin about buyin boxes and havin him crack em for me
Every once in a while I pull a fatty though and I'm not complaining at all but I'm just waiting for that monster pull that I know eventually has to come .
The investment could net me about 250,000 for the year so I really have some thinkin to do , I really would hate to get rid of it , but chances like these don't come around too often .