Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

My faith has been restored in SCA Grading . . .

Clearly, this one is graded accurately, although apparently SCA has gone away from the term "poor", unless their grading scale starts at zero. You will not find a better centered "1" out there:

image

Comments

  • OMG! Why, I ask why would a person grade that card in that condition? Why waste money? image
  • fandangofandango Posts: 2,622
    i always thought PRO,GEM and SCA were people slabbing their own cards in a basement, and that nobody actually submitted these cards....
  • Actually i believe pro has a number of submitters. I think that 90-100% are card doctors though.
  • 1960toppsguy1960toppsguy Posts: 1,127 ✭✭
    Maybe it was a 7 or 8 to begin with and they decided to crack and resubmit and the glue holding the case together somehow got inside the case?
  • MorrellManMorrellMan Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭
    I think it's undergraded and I don't know what all that white stuff on the front of the holder is.image
    Mark (amerbbcards)


    "All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
  • baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭
    WOW!!!
    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • handymanhandyman Posts: 5,459 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The white is on the case and not the card. image
Sign In or Register to comment.