Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1976 PSA 9 George Brett going to Pluto.

Anyone want to take a gander where this will end? It's not the greatest centered '76 I've ever seen but there are only 5 of these graded as such.

1976 George

Comments

  • onefasttalononefasttalon Posts: 1,207 ✭✭✭
    HOLY COW! Seems awfully high for that card... especially for how it looks.

    ALWAYS Looking for Chris Sabo cards!

  • AllenAllen Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭
    Poor centering and a big print dot by his name....it can go to Pluto and stay there- but it will pull $1,725
  • I have to agree completely with Allen. I saw the card and was astonished that it was in a MINT 9 holder. Very unattractive card.
  • yankeeno7yankeeno7 Posts: 9,251 ✭✭✭
    Im not sure if I am surprised that it is up to 1100 and still hasnt met reserve. A fine example of collectors buying the holder and not the card.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    there are only five 9s -- it is the toughest star card from the 1976 set...are any of the other 9s nicer looking?

    When I cracked a vending case of this product, all my Bretts had so much snow, it was ludicrous. I sent in a few for grading, but the best I got was a PSA 8 or a PSA 9 PD
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • MorgothMorgoth Posts: 3,950 ✭✭✭
    Shoeless Joe had a nine that was way better looking and only wanted 1K back about 4 years ago image
    Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
  • Didn't the last one sell less than 2 years ago for around $750?
  • rbdjr1rbdjr1 Posts: 4,474 ✭✭

    I've now seen 4 examples of this card in PSA 9 and if I remember, none of them were that great (...chipped edges, print marks, centering issues, etc., seem to "be the norm"!)

    Here are two scans (the second scan is from my 1976 registry set!)...

    rd

    Edit: Actually, LOL! I've only seen 3 examples of this card as this card being offered is from Cincyfan's set, and I've seen it before!

    image
    image
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    rbd,

    is this mccovey card worth the $35 investment? isn't the centering on this card often tricky or am i confused?

    i have been looking at it for a moment and can't decide whether i should get it or not?

    sgc mccovey '76

    julen
    tgif
    image
    RIP GURU
  • 1960toppsguy1960toppsguy Posts: 1,127 ✭✭
    WOW, I'd be chapped if I bought a PSA-9 that looked like those without seeing them first. I know . . . why would you buy one without seeing it first? Hypothethicaly speaking!image
  • rbdjr1rbdjr1 Posts: 4,474 ✭✭



    << <i>rbd,

    is this mccovey card worth the $35 investment? isn't the centering on this card often tricky or am i confused?

    i have been looking at it for a moment and can't decide whether i should get it or not?

    sgc mccovey '76

    julen
    tgif >>



    That card looks pretty nice to me! I'm confident if u "miss-out" on that example, another well-centered gem will pop-up for sale soon! As for $35? It is quite common. But again, that scan looks pretty sweet!

    rd

  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭


    << <i>rbd,

    is this mccovey card worth the $35 investment? isn't the centering on this card often tricky or am i confused?

    i have been looking at it for a moment and can't decide whether i should get it or not?

    sgc mccovey '76

    julen
    tgif >>



    Cheaper one:

    LINK
  • rbdjr1rbdjr1 Posts: 4,474 ✭✭



    << <i>WOW, I'd be chapped if I bought a PSA-9 that looked like those without seeing them first. I know . . . why would you buy one without seeing it first? Hypothethicaly speaking!image >>



    Speaking for myself, when "one gets caught-up" in building an all-time #1 1976 Topps 660 card registry set, all in PSA 10's and PSA 9's, it was difficult to pass-up a Brett in PSA 9.

    But as this latest auction illustrates, "rare is rare", and certain cards, this Brett being a good example, on any given day, a PSA 9 will command "nose bleed" prices, even these "slider PSA 9 examples".

    One can only imagine, what a "knockout blazer gem" of a 1976 Brett in PSA 9 or 10 would command, if one exists out there?

    I do not remember what I paid for my Brett item, but I'm quite confident, as long as this card remains a "lo pop", I can sell it anytime and make-out ok!

    rd

    edit: P.S. I remember the 1976 PSA 8 Brett I owned. It had questionable centering that made it an 8, otherwise the card was really great looking! I have "given-up" some very nice PSA 8's that I upgraded with PSA 9's and PSA 10's, that some posting here would say, "I made a mistake"! In other words, some of those PSA 8's, were "very close or equal" to my upgrades. Such is life!

    rbdjr1's 1976 Topps - The Number One All Time Finest Set
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    thanks rb and kirk.

    julen

    tgif
    image
    RIP GURU
  • rvcrvc Posts: 559 ✭✭
    he seems to always receive very strong bidding on his items
    Bob
  • ArchStantonArchStanton Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭
    That seller has been moving a ton of '76s lately.
    Collector of 1976 Topps baseball for some stupid reason.
    Collector of Pittsburgh Pirates cards for a slightly less stupid reason.
    My Pirates Collection
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That seller has been moving a ton of '76s lately. >>


    It is a break-up of Cincyfan's set...
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • RipublicaninMassRipublicaninMass Posts: 10,051 ✭✭✭
    ahem, nice set BTW rbd image
Sign In or Register to comment.