Options
1966 Topps Hi numbers
WinPitcher
Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
May very well be the most difficult to obtain. harder then even 1961
any opinions on this?
Steve
edited to add I am talking baseball cards
any opinions on this?
Steve
edited to add I am talking baseball cards
Good for you.
0
Comments
"All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
Pos Team G W L PCT GB
1 BAL 160 97 63 .606 -
2 MIN 162 89 73 .549 9.0
3 DET 162 88 74 .543 10.0
4 CHI 163 83 79 .512 15.0
5 CLE 162 81 81 .500 17.0
6 CAL 162 80 82 .494 18.0
7 KC 160 74 86 .463 23.0
8 WAS 159 71 88 .447 25.5
9 BOS 162 72 90 .444 26.0
10 NY 160 70 89 .440 26.5
National League
Pos Team G W L PCT GB
1 LA 162 95 67 .586 -
2 SF 161 93 68 .578 1.5
3 PIT 162 92 70 .568 3.0
4 PHI 162 87 75 .537 8.0
5 ATL 163 85 77 .525 10.0
6 STL 162 83 79 .512 12.0
7 CIN 160 76 84 .475 18.0
8 HOU 163 72 90 .444 23.0
9 NY 161 66 95 .410 28.5
10 CHI 162 59 103 .364 36.0
Look at the final standings for 1966. All of the major cities such as NY, Boston, Chicago which most certainly had the most baseball card collectors, were out of the pennant races by the end of the summer. LA and SF I would imagine probably did not have a "large" loyal following of baseball card collectors as each of these teams were less than ten years old. So the kids from these major cities of card collecting lost interest late in the summer and the higher numbers weren't bought and printed which led to the rarity. Just my opinion.