Home› PSA Set Registry Forum
Options

1969 Submission grades

gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
in PSA Set Registry Forum
Just got the grades on the 1st 2 invoices I sent. Slightly disappointed, more 8's than expected, but not bad.

897746 and 897748 32776

Comments

  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    Some of the highlights are

    Cards that were POP 0's that are now POP 1's
    #625 Mack Jones
    #279 Roger Nelson
    #77 Ron Perranoski (Invisible) I dont believe this is a 1 though.
    #151 Clay Dalrymple (Orioles)

    1's that are now 2's
    #476 RedSox Rookies
    #466 John Boccabella
    #622 Dan Osinski

    2's that are now 3's
    #452 Al Ferrara
    #453 Mike Cuellar
    #444 Joe Moeller
  • Options
    ZodiacMindwarpZodiacMindwarp Posts: 680 ✭✭
    Bob,

    Please let me know if any of the 8's are available for sale.

    Thank you,
    Michael
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    Email me your interests and I'll let you know whats available. All the 7's are. Theres some 8's and 9's too.
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for sharing the results Bob. Did you consider the Radatz a PSA 8 candidate?
    https://ebay.com/sch/gemint/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
  • Options
    FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    Damn nice invoices - especially 7748.

    Always fun to live vicariously through someone elses submissions!
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    The Radatz should be an 8. Theres maybe 4 small snow flakes thats typical for the card. The Mack Jones I thought was an 8 so it washed out I guess. Out of the 125 cards submitted on these 2 invoices 88 came back graded as expected. There were 11 upgraded from what I thought, and 26 lower than what I thought. I thought I had 4 -10's in there too. Those all came back 9's. Overall I cant complain. I guess my biggest disappointment is that I didnt get any 10's.

  • Options
    magellanmagellan Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭
    Very nice Bob ! email on it's way
    Topps Heritage

    Now collecting:
    Topps Heritage

    1957 Topps BB Ex+-NM
    All Yaz Items 7+
    Various Red Sox
    Did I leave anything out?
  • Options
    TFCTFC Posts: 65 ✭✭
    Hi Gaspipe26
    Some nice grades on the 69's. Is the #178 Oyler For sale. If so please e-mail (momspla@aol.com).
    Thanks
  • Options
    packCollectorpackCollector Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭
    nice grades and you gotta love the 4 day turnaround ofn what I guess was a 60's common submission
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    I sent in 7 invoices, 3 on the 15th 2 on the 21st and 2 on the 22nd. I got 1 from the 15th and 1 from the 21st.

    These are the cards from the 1969 Set I won in the Mastronet auction. Overall a very nice purchase.
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the Radatz is strong, it might be worth a resubmit. I've resubmitted a few cards with light print dots that I thought were undergraded and both bumped to the grade I was expecting.
    https://ebay.com/sch/gemint/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
  • Options
    dudedude Posts: 1,454 ✭✭
    Congratulations Bob! Those are some great submissions! That's a fast turnaround time too! Did you pay for the $6 Vintage Common service or did you use a premium service?
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    $8 15 day
Sign In or Register to comment.