Help with Identifying China Empire coins
I found a box in my collection of ~100 old Chinese coins. I'm just beginning to learn how to properly identify these coins and could use some guidance. Here is a photo of the box, less the dozen I pulled out to pursue identification...
I found an excellent high-level way to explain inscriptions and categorize...
Any others out there to go one level deeper perhaps?
0
Comments
Here is my first unresolved mystery. I have 2 coins with the same inscriptions translating to...
1 Cash - Guangxu Tongbao; Boo-guwang
... but have some differences...
1) One is the size of a US Dime and the other the size of a US Quarter
2) One has a round hole and the other a square hole
3) CoinSnap app identifies one from 1906 and the other from 1875 (not found on Numista)
Numista does show two different possible matching coins, same inscriptions but different size, mint years and holes...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22475.html (1906-1908)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces6817.html (1890-1899)
I don't see any mintage for 1875 as reported by CoinSnap. Could CoinSnap be wrong in this case and the above correct?
I think this is going to be the easiest mystery to solve among the many to come as I work through the box.
I believe the Numista dates are more likely to be correct. It's my understanding that "1875" is the beginning of the reign of the emperor in question (which is where CoinSnap is getting its date from), while "1890" is the year the Kwangtung mint obtained the western coin-making machinery to machine-strike cash coins. The position and orientation of the centre hole for these machine-struck coins is unimportant.
Some of the coins in your box aren't going to be found on that website you linked to, because they are either not Chinese or not from the Qing Dynasty. For example:
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice.
Thanks @sapyx for the great information! I can definitely see the 1875 claim by CoinSnap to be based on the emperor reign. I agree that Numista is a pretty trustworthy record. It's really rare to find a mistake.
I'm curious about your ability to distinguish between asian country coins. Are there some obvious clues I can learn to help guide my efforts or some docs online that would be helpful to a newbie?
Before I attack the box of asian coins, I'd like to work on the few that I pulled out to pursue first. Here is the half dozen I chose, which are generally larger and some sound like silver...
(I've been trying an image match on some, e.g. the lower right gold colored coin, but to no avail.)
NOTE: I believe the 11 waves design is a good indicator of a Japan coin, see top-right reverse.
Alas, that just comes down to "experience". I have seen (and been caught out by) enough of those Japanese and Korean coins to know that those specific types with those characters are from those countries.
They won't be silver. There are a very, very few known silver cash coins, from China and from Vietnam, but they are all excessively rare. If you're seeing traces of grayish metal, they are much more likely to be iron, or a high-tin brass.
Let's go through these six, then. They are all "not your typical Chinese cash", for various reasons. My numbering is from top left to bottom right.
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice.
For a "helpful doc for a newbie", I was going to point you towards this Google Docs document compiled and linked to on zeno.ru... but then I looked at it and it's 175 pages long, so perhaps not exactly a "newbie-friendly" reference.
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice.
@sapyx Just to confirm your findings on #6 above, I found a chinese site with a picture of the same charm. It does not react to a magnet so must be nickel, brass or some other non-steel based alloy. I had to translate the mandarin to get the "happiness, long life..." motto. I'll have to work on that 100 sons thing.
@sapyx I believe I have identified #2 above. Korean 5 Mun 1883 Series 6 Value 5... tongwiyong Joseon dynasty...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces62931.html
So many mint marks, so little time! But I think this is a good first match.