Options
help with potential value here 11 linked baseball cards

hi i hope everyone is having a great day so far would be forever grateful to have some expert eyes on these cards here to give a ballpark figure as far as value goes now they are going to be graded for authenticity and rarity any help would greatly be appreciated so far have not found any of its kind the cards are a misalignment on the front end and there are 11 connecting 1990 Topps cards with the backs are aligned appropriately for the player on the face of the card thanks a million
Tagged:
0
Comments
They are miscut cards. There isn't any significant value graded or not. You might find a player collector that would pay a small premium but it wouldn't be anywhere worth the grading fees of any third party grader. The problem with 1990 is there are many uncut sheets out there and someone could cut them up how they want if there was any type of premium worth it
thanks for feedback for some reason can not find any authentic uncut sheets as most look counterfeit and none match the cards displayed in the prior post and also these cards are from authentic Topps card packs any further feedback would be greatly appreciated thanks much
and forgot to mention the back of each card the details are aligned correctly as a full sheet if you were to cut it would not cut off details in the back of the card as well
Um......after typing "1990 topps baseball uncut sheet" into the Ebay search bar, there are at least a hundred items, with the green sheet within the first five items. It's the bottom row, fyi. In fact, it took way less time for me to find an example of the sheet in question than it did to type this.
And yet, you had the abilty to find this PSA website, register to post and upload a photo, demonstrating the ability to use a computer with some level of sophistication.
That said, assuming that you are not trolling, PatriotTrading provided the correct response. These are very common 1990 cards which are miscut. Finding a buyer for them willing to pay even a dollar may prove difficult and time consuming.
Edit to indicate that you are correct in that the cards aren't miscut, per se, but that the printing on either the front (more likely) or back is misaligned.
I used to practice cutting on 1990 Topps sheets. I think they are about as easy to find as blades of grass.
great and thanks for all your feedback what is intriguing with these cards is that the back of the cards are not cut off the details are all in line meaning if you took a sheet and miscut it you would cut off parts of the contents in the back for think of these cards as miscut in front and perfect details in the back and one would think psa would be able to determine of the cards are unique from a packs or cut from a sheet
For some reason those cards remind me of Beer Cup Snake at Wrigley. Please don't waste your money on PSA grading them. Enjoy the "uniqueness" of your cards and buy yourself a nice steak dinner instead.
.
Many times the fronts and the backs are completely misaligned and the images were shifted to not match well. This was an issue on certain big cards. Think maybe the 81 Topps Joe Montana rookie often it was tough because you could have nice centering on the front but horrible centering on the back.
I believe this is an indication that it is a printing error, not a cutting error.
I'm not so sure PSA will grade cards that far miscut. CGC might though.
They are not miscuts. They are misprints.
No idea if anyone will slab them but based on his description (normal backs, shifted fronts) they are printing errors that could not be replicated with an uncut sheet.
IMHO exactly follows the trolling template.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
I see some rare teams like Kansas City Oyals, LA Odgers, and Cincinatti Eds. But unfortunately, Thers's not really a big market for these teams....
https://kennerstartinglineup.blogspot.com/
considering if there is no other 1990 topps set like this from the topps directly from there
printing and cutting and considering over production of cards massive this would greatly increase the
rarity of the cards if its 1/1 and confirmed not from a uncut sheets meaning you have some many cards produced
however there is no no other population of these cards one would think its would drastically raise the rarity and value one would think any thoughts thanks a million everyone
Don't think you convince anyone here these are anything better than trash. If you do then Ive a bunch stuff I want to unload to whatever rube that is..
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
possibly your bunch of stuff is there millions of the same cards out there and not 1/1 population and this is not talking about cutting sheets to make cards this is directly from topps packaged
surely not attempting to convince anyone just figuring something out one thing is for sure the cards are not from uncut sheets and they are from packs and lastly considering the abundance of duplicate uncut sheets and 1990 topps over produced cards if these cards are only 1 population in existence one would think there is value especially since there is even more cards out there however none that are the same as these
Value is a function of supply and demand.
Your cards are probably "rare" (although the rest of the misprinted sheet is presumably out there), but there is apparently little demand, which means value would be low.
Throw them on ebay and see what happens. I believe it will be difficult to sell them for anything since shipping costs and ebay fees will be greater than what someone else will want to pay. But that's just my thoughts. Your thoughts are certainly in the minority here, so throw them up on ebay and see what happens. It's free to list on ebay.
>
Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.