Any thoughts on this 1932-D
Jmitch
Posts: 4 ✭
0
Jmitch
Posts: 4 ✭
Jmitch
Posts: 4 ✭
Comments
Since you give us no hint as to whatever question you may have, I'll take a stab:
This is a key-date for the series, not much worn. The photos, while nicely detailed, don't allow me to get much a sense for what the coin looks like. I am guessing that it's AU by details, but its surfaces look off to me, as it it has been cleaned.
I'm always cautious on 32-D & S quarters that aren't slabbed.
Just saying, but the D mintmark looks not to be worn as much as the rest of the reverse. Could it have been added? I'll leave that call to someone with way more experience than I have.............
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
Photos are not adequate to even begin to offer an opinion of the coin.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
the first picture is slightly cut-off and, worse, a bit fuzzy and looks like some used the "pastel" filter on it. it is also over lit.
the reverse is clearer but still a little fuzzy.
both photos' white balance is off. is it really that color? no.
the closeup of the mintmark is probably good for you, but since the 32-d could be a 32 with an added mintmark, the closeup is not at all useful for any determination
i suspect the fuzziness is from taking the picture and then using tech to do "closeups."
get closeups using the phone and don't post-process zoom them. then crop to just the coin. a closeup of just the mintmark will be a challenge, but is necessary
the fuzziness and lighting makes guessing the grade really tough
good luck with the new photos
Looks like an added mintmark. Put a few drops of acetone on the mintmark to see if it falls off.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
The shape and style of the D looks correct as far as I can tell; the images blur when I try to zoom.
That said though, the D seems to “float” on the surface rather than be slightly sunken in, and also seems slightly smaller, so I agree with @PerryHall.
I would not buy one that is raw.
Would like to see a clear closeup of the mintmark.
The style may be different but can’t say for sure with present photo.
Thread coin 1932 quarter shown below. My filtering.
.
.
My 1932, fresh photo's.
.
.
.
Something's up,
with the photo's shown by the the thread posted. No effort used for a proper reply.