1985 Fleer Rack Box Break

Options

All,

I've been a long-time reader of this forum. Tonight's the night I step through the door and start posting around here.

I received this box of 1985 Fleer Racks yesterday, BBCE wrapped and FASC, but I have no idea whether the racks are the player-showing-on-top and wrapped in individual cellos, or the individually wrapped wax packs. I contacted the seller and asked him if he could tell. Answer: No. So I searched the Internet high and low to find some shred of evidence that would tell me which rack type I have. What did I find? Nothing. So I contacted Steve at BBCE. He, too, didn't know how to tell because he had seen so few of these boxes come his way.

So I purchased the box anyway, desiring to look at it up close to see if I could tell which rack type was inside. At this point, I'm 99% sure that the type of rack inside is the individually wrapped cellos. So I'm busting the BBCE wrap and the other factory plastic wrap tonight. And you guys can come along for the ride.

Here's the box.

Andy

Andy

Comments

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Point of no return, at least from an authenticated, BBCE-wrapped point of view, that is.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The box's exterior looks beautiful, by the way, and has the freshness of a box that came from the factory yesterday.

    I've searched for a long time for a 1985 Fleer Rack Box. It's one of those boxes that I never thought I'd find, and then if I found one, I thought I'd never be able to afford it. This one was a no-brainer since it coincided with last week's eBay offering of 20% off everything.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The factory wrap is off.
    I'm going to pause a minute before lifting the cardboard top.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Sneak peak.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    These racks are so crispy new. I'm getting a contact high from being so close to the newly unearthed plastic that has been imprisoned for the last 33 years. The colors, too, are almost blinding.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Left side first. A few racks at a time, in the order that they're pulled.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options




    Andy

  • craig44
    craig44 Posts: 13,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Welcome aboard! Great pics and a very nice box. You don't see those every day

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Thanks for the welcome, Craig!
    A few more...


    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very little star power so far. But Rack #11 did yield a nice rookie. I loved Hershiser as a kid, especially loved him in the '88 World Series.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Half way done.

    Andy

  • grote15
    grote15 Posts: 30,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very cool! Those racks certainly fit the "case fresh" designation!



    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Indeed, grote, these are "fresh," as fresh as I've ever seen.

    One thing I noticed is that the cellophane is thicker than the cellophane of the '84 Fleer Racks. Both racks -- '84 and '85 -- contain the same number of cards and stickers per rack, but the '85 box is about 3/4" higher than the '84 box. The difference in height is probably due to the thickness in cellophane. The '85 Racks feel more durable than the '84s in hand.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Ok, right side. 12 racks remain.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Yikes, the star power is altogether absent from this box. A Brett, Fisk, Morris, Hershiser. And up to this point on side two, nada.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options



    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options




    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    And that's it, folks. No major rookies. Oh well. I loved the idea of the hunt. I'm an unopened collector, but not someone who opens a lot of his collection. This box will look awesome next to my '84 Fleer Rack Box.

    Andy

    Andy

  • jordangretzkyfan
    jordangretzkyfan Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    This is awesome! I love the 1985 Fleer set and agree that these minty racks are super rare. Congrats on this great purchase. I was looking at that box too. Hope there is a perfect Eric Davis in there...loved that card as a kid.

  • JWBlue
    JWBlue Posts: 490 ✭✭✭
    Options

    1985 Fleer is a slightly underrated set.

    What hurts it is the same as what hurts one of my favorite designs 1986 Donruss. The vast majority of photographs are head shots or poses off the diamond. Not a lot of action.

    As for the 1985 Fleer stacks being taller than 1984 there is another reason besides thicker cellophane. The card stock for 1985 is a lot thicker.

  • BLUEJAYWAY
    BLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Always liked that years design. I wonder how many people won the offered $100 savings bond prize. No one I knew did.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:
    Always liked that years design. I wonder how many people won the offered $100 savings bond prize. No one I knew did.

    Funny, I was thinking the same thing as I stared at the first racks on top. What a strange offer.

    Andy

  • ahopkins
    ahopkins Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @JWBlue said:
    The vast majority of photographs are head shots or poses off the diamond. Not a lot of action.

    As for the 1985 Fleer stacks being taller than 1984 there is another reason besides thicker cellophane. The card stock for 1985 is a lot thicker.

    I hear ya about the head shots, but that Clemens head shot is way cool. The determined look in his eye, steely, controlled, poised. Magnificent shot.

    And very interesting about the card stock. I hadn't noticed it. I'll have to look at the '84 and '85 side by side. Thanks for the info.

    Andy

    Andy

  • BLUEJAYWAY
    BLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    These Fleer remind me of the nicknames from that era. Mickey"Mick the Quick" Rivers,Dennis"Oil Can" Boyd,Sid"El Sid" Fernandez,John"The Candy Man" Candelaria. Also Kent Tekulve with the sidewinder/submarine delivery. Joe Carters card was "Hot" back then as well.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Halonut
    Halonut Posts: 78 ✭✭
    Options

    Welcome to the boards, if you want to move the sealed rack with Mark Langston showing let me know. Thanks!