Grade opinions... 1952 Mays. (finally sent in and grade popped today PSA 6 MC)
1966CUDA
Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭✭
Thoughts on what this would grade? I don't see any wrinkles/creases and no writing or pin holes. Will the stain in upper right corner get a ST designation? Also, will top/bottom centering get a qualifier?
Thanks-
Claude
0
Comments
PSA-2
Send it to me
It's gotta be better than a PSA 2 doesn't it??...here are scans of two I found on ebay, and they look worse than mine.
I think is is a 3.
I would assume others are concerned about the stain and would rate it a 4 otherwise.
I think it is a 2, maybe 2.5
I would say PSA 3.
Cory
I believe the tilt and centering make it appear worse than it is. I can see it in a 3.5 or even a 4 holder.
http://www.unisquare.com/store/brick/
Ralph
Probably grade a PSA 5 or 6 with the (ST) qualifier or if you request no qualifier you are looking at a PSA 3 or 4. My 2 cents.
Great looking 2!
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
either a 4 or trimmed on the left edge. the stain , unless it is more pronounced in person, will not get it a qualifier in this grade range, neither will the centering
Claude, don't listen to packCollector. The only packs he collects are packs of cigarettes
I agree the tilt makes it look worse than it's technical grade. With that said, I'm thinking in the PSA 4 range.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
Finally got around to sending in.... grade just popped. PSA 6 MC. I would have thought OC qualifier because border still showing on bottom...I thought MC shows portion of the next card on the border? Is either qualifier "worse" than the other?
The MC qualifier could be because of the back of the card. Post a pict. of the back. I think I would rather have the OC than MC qualifier.
What's the back look like Claude?
I'm guessing that's where the MC is coming from?
I will have to post a scan when I get it back.. I can't remember what the back looks like.
Miscut can also mean this, which I believe is the case here.