These cards both came back in today's mail. One OC, one not. I'm happy they both didn't come back OC but if I had to pick one, I'd say the Yaz is worse.
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
The Spahn is well off center both in both directions. The Yaz is only o/c from left to right, but the top to bottom is very good. It's not even close, the Yaz is the better centered card.
<< <i>The Spahn is well off center both in both directions. The Yaz is only o/c from left to right, but the top to bottom is very good. It's not even close, the Yaz is the better centered card. >>
+1
'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.' -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
Comments
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
as much as i love Yaz, i think the Spahn is better
its a toss up though as the Spahn has a slight tilt (at least the picture does), but the Yaz has some edge issues
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
SPAHN: 68/32
YAZ: 70/30
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
<< <i>The Spahn is well off center both in both directions. The Yaz is only o/c from left to right, but the top to bottom is very good. It's not even close, the Yaz is the better centered card. >>
+1
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA