Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

'74 Nolan Ryan PSA 9 (PWCC Certified) back again

Linky

First, not my card.

There was some discussion of this card a while back when it was purchased for +/- $1,600. Personally, I thought a big gamble on a 9 that might crack out to be a 10. Surprisingly, its' back on the auction block. Just can't imagine this thing going for that amount again. Will be interesting to see if the 2nd place bidder in the original auction peeks their head again. 2nd place bidder (s***e) had no previous bids for anything. Winner (9***7) had two retractions. Than a literal chasm to the 3rd place bidder.

I did purchase a PWCC certified card ('72 Rose in Action) and absolutely love it. But only paid a slight premium. Reviewing at my cardboard forensic lab, it looks as good as advertised.








Collecting PSA 9's from 1970-1977. Raw 9's from 72-77. Raw 10's from '78-'83.
Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
Prefer to buy in bulk.

Comments

  • KendallCatKendallCat Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good catch and pretty much everyone in the hobby knew something fishy was going on with that auction. VCP for the card is constant in the $400-500 range before this one explodes to $1600! Winner also won a PSA 9 Ryan 1-2 months earlier from Probstein for $400 range so not quite sure of their motivation for this one with bidding up and retraction as you say. Thoughts on this one?
  • begsu1013begsu1013 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭
    the gentleman that purchased this card reached out to me after seeing the 1st thread and seemed pretty happy w/ the price. have purchased several cards from him over the years and he usually has a great eye and is known for bumping nines to tens.

    i do not know if he purchased his own card in this instance, very well could be. also, i would be about 99% confident that it was reviewed for the bump at least a time or two and apparently still in the 9 holder. still say it looks like a tremendous card from the scans, however i am wondering if there isn't some small surface issue w/ her that cant be seen thru the pics that's kept her there.
  • SdubSdub Posts: 736 ✭✭✭


    << <i>PSA 9 Nolan Ryan PWCC High End >>




    Thank you. What did I do wrong on the link? Followed exact directions from some previous posts.

    Collecting PSA 9's from 1970-1977. Raw 9's from 72-77. Raw 10's from '78-'83.
    Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
    Prefer to buy in bulk.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>PSA 9 Nolan Ryan PWCC High End >>




    Thank you. What did I do wrong on the link? Followed exact directions from some previous posts. >>


    You clicked 'https' instead of 'http', hopefully the updated forum software will prevent this from being an issue in the near future.
  • dberk12dberk12 Posts: 399 ✭✭
    I agree with the group. If this card is not in a 10 holder by now it will never be. There had to be some unsuccessful reviews since the last auction. This should take away from the "certified high end" label in this case. It is clearly a sweet 9 but it detracts from those with aspirations to bump.


    Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.





    -George F. Will
  • "I agree with the group. If this card is not in a 10 holder by now it will never be. There had to be some unsuccessful reviews since the last auction.
    This should take away from the "certified high end" label in this case. It is clearly a sweet 9 but it detracts from those with aspirations to bump."

    I was wondering about this when the "certified high end" label came out. Do you think there is any sort of bias to cards with the label as to PSA bumping them?
  • dberk12dberk12 Posts: 399 ✭✭
    I think it is implied that the card in question is an excellent example for the grade and has a better chance to bump than an average to low end card in the same grade. However, once a "certified high end" card appears up for auction a second time it can also be implied that the buyer paid top dollar for the card possibly thinking they had a chance to bump, tried to bump unsuccessfully - especially if there was a decent amount of time elapsed since the first auction, and is now trying to flip the card again.

    It comes down to what your goals are with the purchase. If you want the card because you agree with PWCC that it looks great for the grade and are willing to pay top dollar to add it to your collection you won't be disappointed. If you are looking at the card for investment purposes thinking you have a great chance to bump you may be disappointed.


    Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.





    -George F. Will
  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    Maybe the next buyer will have the guts to overpay, crack and resubmit?

    image


    Dave
  • seebelowseebelow Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭
    since the 2nd place bidder had no previous bids for anything. he just may surface again for this one.

    you guys are spot on with your discussion. nice pickup sdub.
    Interested in higher grade vintage cards. Aren't we all. image
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,116 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with these comments. I'm sure the winner tried to bump it unsuccessfully. I think the card will still go for a premium due to the eye appeal but I doubt people will be chasing it as strongly hoping for a 10 and sizable profit.
  • begsu1013begsu1013 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭
    when the original program was announced and laid out by brent, one of the concerns was with an actual sticker being placed upon the slab itself...

    brent answered w/ the sticker can be placed on at anytime you wish or maybe request it not be applied and then have it applied again should you ever decide to resell.

    luckily it was an optional request but my concerns was whether or not it was an actual good thing to have on there when subbing for a review. i think we would all agree that based on the initial prices that were being paid, that at least one review was going to occur and perhaps occasional bumps were likely to follow.

    either way, our slabbed collecting industry isn't too monstrutive and i am sure someone, somewhere at psa has seen the program and it's implied hints.

    with that being said, i don't know too many businesses that would grant rewards simply based on another's opinion. not claiming that's the approach here or that bumps are even a 30% given. the program is marketed as "it's simply at the higher end of the spectrum for that particular grade", but still. could there be some sort of resentment that they feel like they are saying that psa didn't get it right? maybe. again, not it's intent. but the sticker IS there right in the grader's face. if he didn't know about the program, then i certainly think they would search to find out "what is this sticker all about?". is there any other company out there that places it's company sticker on psa's slabs for anything other than advertising purposes?

    at the end of the day, i just don't think it would be a good thing to sub the "high end" card w/ the pwcc sticker on it. especially when it could be applied later at any date...

    and just outta curiosity, are there any cards thus far that have received a bump?

  • SdubSdub Posts: 736 ✭✭✭
    I'm still on the fence about the sticker. Certainly not interpreting PWCC's "high end" designation would mean a bump in grade. Whomever is making that assumption is taking a big risk. The Ryan just went for $1,050. About $600 loss for someone.

    As I stated, I do own a "high end' card from PWCC and I'm very happy with it. The last thing I thought about was trying to bump it to a 10. It's just a very nice 9, as the certificate states. I paid a little more, and that's fine with me.

    Collecting PSA 9's from 1970-1977. Raw 9's from 72-77. Raw 10's from '78-'83.
    Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
    Prefer to buy in bulk.
  • dberk12dberk12 Posts: 399 ✭✭


    << <i> As I stated, I do own a "high end' card from PWCC and I'm very happy with it. The last thing I thought about was trying to bump it to a 10. It's just a very nice 9, as the certificate states. I paid a little more, and that's fine with me. >>



    I share your mindset. I think it is worth paying a reasonable premium for a card you are completely satisfied with that you wanted to add to your PC. This obviously holds true for any sweet card that you are going after, not just the PWCC sticker. The trouble comes in when someone is trying to hit a grand slam with a review/bump and the goal of flipping the card.


    Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.





    -George F. Will
  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    I collect cards that I feel are high end, not PWCC stickers telling me what Brent thinks. I stand
    by what I said earlier. The sticker is a marketing effort to drive better prices and is aimed at those
    who either don't know better or are just too busy to take the time to do the evaluations themselves.

    It's the same issue as buying the slab instead if buying the card.


    Dave
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 3,479 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I collect cards that I feel are high end, not PWCC stickers telling me what Brent thinks. I stand
    by what I said earlier. The sticker is a marketing effort to drive better prices and is aimed at those
    who either don't know better or are just too busy to take the time to do the evaluations themselves.

    It's the same issue as buying the slab instead if buying the card. >>



    PWCC is in business to make money and make money for their consignors. Is the card better than most 9's, maybe?
    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I collect cards that I feel are high end, not PWCC stickers telling me what Brent thinks. I stand
    by what I said earlier. The sticker is a marketing effort to drive better prices and is aimed at those
    who either don't know better or are just too busy to take the time to do the evaluations themselves.

    It's the same issue as buying the slab instead if buying the card. >>



    +1

    All the other superlatives are just noise, imo.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • begsu1013begsu1013 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭
    the cup is both half full and half empty for me.

    agreed both about the marketing strategy and that it is a definitely a higher end 9.
Sign In or Register to comment.