Opinions on this Morgan.

TorinoCobra71

Grade? Original? The Reverse is cleaned OR is it Die Polish lines?

TIA:

coinguy1

Gary, based on the multiple directions of the lines, my guess is that it is cleaning, not die polish lines on the reverse. And the images don't allow for a good look at the coin, so I would avoid it.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were cleaning over most of the surfaces.

Dog97

Kinda shiny and rev looks hairlined from being wiped. Looks like a lightly cleaned 58.

blu62vette

I would guess a wiping/cleaning on the reverse.

TorinoCobra71

<< <i>Gary, based on the multiple directions of the lines, my guess is that it is cleaning, not die polish lines on the reverse. And the images don't allow for a good look at the coin, so I would avoid it.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were cleaning over most of the surfaces. >>



Thanks, Y'all thats what I kinda expected. Its always nice to get a second opinion, though.



TC71

AUandAG

Notice the dirt in the D on the reverse? It's been dipped repeatedly and
is spotting as well. Typically Morgans had no spots. Dipping with an improper
rinsing will leave those little round dip residues. It does look wiped on the
reverse as well.

bob

kurtdog

Die polish lines are easy enough to tell as they show up as raised. Those lines on that reverse are from a gentle wipe. The coin may have been lightly dipped, as well, from what I think I can make of that surface-reflectivity. At any rate, nothing very harsh, and still a market acceptable coin, IMHO.