Along with full breast feathers and the hair above the ear, I also look for good definition around the nose and mouth. Sometimes you can find Morgan's with what I call "Full Cheek" that have been fully struck up. You can see how puffy the cheek is on this 80-S with the good detail around the mouth, lips, and nose.
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL.
Wow, I like this thread, keep the info and pics coming......wondering: does the strike affect the grade all things being equal???? Pics here are MS65, but I am going back to shoot them again to bring out the breast feathers and the curly hair....I never considered them before at all............
No pics at the moment but my personal favorite place to check strike characteristics is on the eagle's claws. On the better pieces you'll be able to see several "lines" on each claw or whatever you want to call them. The weakly struck pieces almost never show these.
The other thing to keep in mind is the several minor design changes in the series, for example the breast feathers look much different on the 1921 than on any other date
For those that don't know, I am starting pharmacy school in the fall.
This is a great thread. Definitely helpful to me as a beginner. Good tips! So would a "complete" morgan collection include weak and strong strikes of each coin?
Would this be considered a weak strike?
Edited for pictures.
1887 P Morgans Please!!! My collections!!!! : : Photos
<< <i>Along with full breast feathers and the hair above the ear, I also look for good definition around the nose and mouth. Sometimes you can find Morgan's with what I call "Full Cheek" that have been fully struck up. You can see how puffy the cheek is on this 80-S with the good detail around the mouth, lips, and nose.
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL. >>
I actually think that the 1892 is a poorly made proof, from the picture.
PNG member, numismatic dealer since 1965. Operates a retail store, also has exhibited at over 1000 shows. I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
<< <i>This is a great thread. Definitely helpful to me as a beginner. Good tips! So would a "complete" morgan collection include weak and strong strikes of each coin? >>
Some years it is hard to find good strikes. A complete set would have a vast majority strong strikes some weak ones. Several of the "o" mint coins come weak. Even those years considered weak, you will still find some full strikes. It is just not the norm.
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL. >>
I actually think that the 1892 is a poorly made proof, from the picture. >>
Here is a closer look at the rim and letters. I am thinking Business Strike rather than Proof, not seeing the square flat-top letters and rim. If it is a proof, yes it was very poorly made.
Reverse-Struck Thru from Denticle to F
Obverse-This looks like a long die scratch underneath the P
Prime coins for seeing just how bad Morgans were struck are the Philadelphia mint coins along with many of the New Orleans issues. Philadelphia seemed to simply let the dies run too long, whereas New Orleans seemed to strike with less pressure in order to preserve the dies.
Carson City and SF were definitely the better mints for Morgans.
I recommend Q David Bowers book on Morgan dollars, "A Guide Book of Morgan Silver Dollars". He lists each coin in the series by date and mint, then he describes each mintage in detail, such as striking quality, etc.
Comments
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL.
Great pictures and coins, by the way.
Any examples of a poorly stuck Morgan to compare?
Thanks!
My YouTube Channel
Typical well struck CC-Mint coin:
Thanks
The other thing to keep in mind is the several minor design changes in the series, for example the breast feathers look much different on the 1921 than on any other date
This one is weaker, look above the ear:
Look at all the detail in the hair above the ear on this one:
Would this be considered a weak strike?
Edited for pictures.
My collections!!!! : : Photos
My new VAMmer facebook group! : Silver Dollar VAMmers
<< <i>Along with full breast feathers and the hair above the ear, I also look for good definition around the nose and mouth. Sometimes you can find Morgan's with what I call "Full Cheek" that have been fully struck up. You can see how puffy the cheek is on this 80-S with the good detail around the mouth, lips, and nose.
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL. >>
I actually think that the 1892 is a poorly made proof, from the picture.
I firmly believe in numismatics as the world's greatest hobby, but recognize that this is a luxury and without collectors, we can all spend/melt our collections/inventories.
eBaystore
<< <i>This is a great thread. Definitely helpful to me as a beginner. Good tips! So would a "complete" morgan collection include weak and strong strikes of each coin?
>>
Some years it is hard to find good strikes. A complete set would have a vast majority strong strikes some weak ones. Several of the "o" mint coins come weak. Even those years considered weak, you will still find some full strikes. It is just not the norm.
Thanks everyone!
My YouTube Channel
Weak strike on this 1892-P MS63 DPL. Notice the flat area above the ear and on the breast feathers.
Edited to show the weak strike on the 1892 ms63 DPL. >>
I actually think that the 1892 is a poorly made proof, from the picture. >>
Here is a closer look at the rim and letters. I am thinking Business Strike rather than Proof, not seeing the square flat-top letters and rim. If it is a proof, yes it was very poorly made.
Reverse-Struck Thru from Denticle to F
Obverse-This looks like a long die scratch underneath the P
Carson City and SF were definitely the better mints for Morgans.
I recommend Q David Bowers book on Morgan dollars, "A Guide Book of Morgan Silver Dollars". He lists each coin in the series by date and mint, then he describes each mintage in detail, such as striking quality, etc.
.....................................................