Which sets from the 1993-2003 time period will still be talked about 20-30 years from now ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bba8/5bba895a790bab6b82e841cde0ff6e26c76e131e" alt="dtkk49a"
Okay, there are some no brainers. 93 Finest comes to mind. But which other sets do you think will be remembered 20 years from now?
For some reason, I can't think of too many.
For some reason, I can't think of too many.
Follow me - Cards_and_Coins on Instagram
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
0
Comments
The big UD basketball product a couple of years back. my mind went blank.
Will they set the hobby on fire? No. But they'll contionue to be popular especially when PSA registry set collectors start to focus on them the way others are with the vintage now. Remember, with each new generation comes a new batch of nostalgia.
Arthur
"Remember, with each new generation comes a new batch of nostalgia." I 'll quote Garth on this one--"When monkeys fly out of my b*tt"
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
I think 1995 Bow Best is stacked, I also second 93 SP with Jeter and Damon and 94 with Arod and wagner. Probably 1992 Bowman. 1993 Finest has no rookies to carry it, if jeter was in it, then you would have something. Also 1997 Bowman Chrome as it is stacked with star and tons of semi star rookies. 1999 BC is in the same boat.
Yes, I collect shiny modern crap
All your Shaq are belong to me
<< <i>03-04 Exquisite Collection basketball will also stand the test of time, >>
Much like what people said about 00-01 UD Ultiamte Collection Basketball.....
I think it would greatly help the popularity of the set if PSA would let them get graded at the reglar price, rather than the expensive PSA/DNA route, but either way ... I think it will still be a popular set.
Mike
<< <i>"Remember, with each new generation comes a new batch of nostalgia." I 'll quote Garth on this one--"When monkeys fly out of my b*tt" >>
Look around the registry. You've got plenty of guys who are battling it out with massive modern company/team/player sets who's cards are more often than not, worth less than the grading fees. Nostalgia is a driving force in this hobby.
For me, nostalgia isn't Babe Ruth, 1952 Topps, Mickey Mantle, or Willie Mays. It's not even Reggie Jackson or Pete Rose... it's Will Clark, Matt Williams, Ryne Sandberg, Tony Gwynn, Cal Ripken Jr, etc.
I was at a Sacramento Rivercats game a few months ago, when Dan Johnson came to bat for the 'Cats. He ripped a line-drive homer over the right field fence into the fans sitting on the grassy hill (you sit on what ever you bring with you). Anyways, I commented to my wife about how Johnson was recently demoted from Oakland due to his hitting problems, but somehow turned it all around and was dominating minor league pitching. A little kid sitting behind me, asked me "Does he hit homers like Nick Swisher? Cuz Nick Swisher hits big giant home runs! Nick Swisher is the best!"
I don't give Swisher much of a second thought, but who knows. This kid, in 20 years, might talk about how Nick Swisher was his childhood hero, etc, and maybe he'll try to build a registry set for him. That's nostalgia.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25