It means that when you look at the coin, you like it so much your heart skips a beat and you have to swallow from the over production of saliva in your mouth.
Just like MONSTER, MOOSE is all too frequently used for coins that do not qualify. A MOOSE must be truly extraordinary, and stand head and shoulders beyond its peers.
Gary, there is nothing close to universal agreement as to what constitutes a "moose" in numismatics.
The meaning/application of the word is subjective and over-hyped. But, my take on it is that it's roughly equivalent to a "monster" and obviously WAY better than a "dog" or a "pig". I hope that clears things up for you
<< <i>Gary, there is nothing close to universal agreement as to what constitutes a "moose" in numismatics.
The meaning/application of the word is subjective and over-hyped. But, my take on it is that it's roughly equivalent to a "monster" and obviously WAY better than a "dog" or a "pig". I hope that clears things up for you >>
<< <i>A MOOSE must be truly extraordinary, and stand head and shoulders beyond its peers.
Russ, NCNE >>
Gary, IMHO, a "Moose", by definition, is a coin that falls under Russ's criteria above. A Moose is a coin that just simply blows away it's peers in terms of technical grade quality, but more importantly, the ever-so-important factor- Eye Appeal. A picture is worth 1000 words, so here's an example...
Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat".
Edited to add:
<< <i>This coin is the moose for this die marriage in my opinion. >>
Gladiator, in order to qualify as an official "moose" a coin must stand on its own as such. It can't be merely a relative "moose" or a moose's relative, either, for that matter.
As kind of a slang term, there is no "dictionary" definition. I was told somewhere (Travers book maybe?) that moose generally means a fantastic white coin as compared to a monster which would involve toning.
<< <i>Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat". >>
But Mark, according to you, a moose, is decided buy the owner!
<< Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat". >>
<< <i>But Mark, according to you, a moose, is decided buy the owner! >>
Gary, where did I say that (exactly)? I made reference to the term being subjective and over-hyped, but wouldn't EVER let the biased owner make such a determination.
In all my hunting for cameo and deep cameo coins, I can count on one hand the number of examples I've found that I would consider to be of MOOSE caliber. Even my PR68DCAM Accented Hair does not, in my opinion, qualify. Value or rarity alone does not make a coin a MOOSE.
This is another MOOSE:
That one blows away every other DCAM 1964 I've ever seen.
1964 Kennedy- Recently submitted as part of my first submission ever (to NCS+NGC)
1959 Penny- the pictures are blurry because each time I see it my hands start shaking.
Worst photographs ever?
Please download this app to help fight cancer at 0 cost. At no extra cost to you purchases from Amazon and other participating retailers will benefit research!
For definition sake ; This would be a dog , pig , overweight water buffalo , or not even in the running ?
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."
<< <i>For definition sake ; This would be a dog , pig , overweight water buffalo , or not even in the running ? >>
That would be none of the above, but a very pretty coin, nonetheless. Thanks for not getting carried away.
With no disrespect aimed at Kennedy halves (or their owners or admirers), a couple of the ones posted in this thread exhibit haze and/or other distractions which would keep them out of the "moose" category. Please folks, let's not kill the "moose" by exhausting it through over-hype.
<< <i>Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat".
Edited to add:
<< <i>This coin is the moose for this die marriage in my opinion. >>
Gladiator, in order to qualify as an official "moose" a coin must stand on its own as such. It can't be merely a relative "moose" or a moose's relative, either, for that matter. >>
Coin LT's half dime is a MOOSE ! I know the coin well.....
In my opinion...everyone will know it when they see it.........the definition will differ depending on your specialty for sure but a true moose must have exceptional eye appeal to me and gem surfaces doesn't hurt either. In toned coins we like to use the term moose quite often to describe "A" box toners......I have some amazing coins but probably only have 1 true moose in my entire collection.
Comments
Russ, NCNE
Oh yeah SCREW YOU™
TorinoCobra71
<< <i>You know damn well I got the HOTS for that Proof Kennnedy. >>
Russ, NCNE
nose hairs before you showed
that coin again.
Camelot
<< <i>....in reference to coin collecting?!??!?!??!
TIA
TorinoCobra71 >>
<< <i>
<< <i>....in reference to coin collecting?!??!?!??!
TIA
TorinoCobra71 >>
You GUYS are a Real RIOT ACT Tonight! First Russ now KSteel!
TorinoCobra71
"Hopefully someone will provide me with a proper education........"
David
Russ, NCNE
TorinoCobra71
The meaning/application of the word is subjective and over-hyped. But, my take on it is that it's roughly equivalent to a "monster" and obviously WAY better than a "dog" or a "pig". I hope that clears things up for you
<< <i>Gary, there is nothing close to universal agreement as to what constitutes a "moose" in numismatics.
The meaning/application of the word is subjective and over-hyped. But, my take on it is that it's roughly equivalent to a "monster" and obviously WAY better than a "dog" or a "pig". I hope that clears things up for you
well said mark
Go BIG or GO HOME. ©Bill
<< <i>A MOOSE must be truly extraordinary, and stand head and shoulders beyond its peers.
Russ, NCNE >>
Gary, IMHO, a "Moose", by definition, is a coin that falls under Russ's criteria above. A Moose is a coin that just simply blows away it's peers in terms of technical grade quality, but more importantly, the ever-so-important factor- Eye Appeal.
A picture is worth 1000 words, so here's an example...
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
That Classic Commem is a MOOSE alright! You must have some incredible bandwidth limits...
TorinoCobra71
This would also be a moose in my opinion. Although sometimes smaller coins dont get the moose recognition they deserve.
siliconvalleycoins.com
edited to add: CoinLt's 1872 Dime is a solid Moose.
Edited to add:
<< <i>This coin is the moose for this die marriage in my opinion. >>
Gladiator, in order to qualify as an official "moose" a coin must stand on its own as such. It can't be merely a relative "moose" or a moose's relative, either, for that matter.
<< <i>Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat".
But Mark, according to you, a moose, is decided buy the owner!
TC71
<< <i>But Mark, according to you, a moose, is decided buy the owner!
Gary, where did I say that (exactly)?
This is another MOOSE:
That one blows away every other DCAM 1964 I've ever seen.
Russ, NCNE
We recently went through a large deal of Proof Sets, and pulled a lot of one sided Moose coins from the 68-70 sets, but never did find a 2 sided Moose
Here's one that graded 69* Cameo
42/92
1964 Kennedy- Recently submitted as part of my first submission ever (to NCS+NGC)
1959 Penny- the pictures are blurry because each time I see it my hands start shaking.
Worst photographs ever?
http://my.affinity.is/cancer-research?referral_code=MjI4Nzgz
<< <i>Worst photographs ever? >>
I've seen worse on eBay...
Save up some cash, and invest in a copy stand and some lights... or find a really cheap tri-pod
42/92
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
<< <i>For definition sake ; This would be a dog , pig , overweight water buffalo , or not even in the running ? >>
That would be none of the above, but a very pretty coin, nonetheless. Thanks for not getting carried away.
With no disrespect aimed at Kennedy halves (or their owners or admirers), a couple of the ones posted in this thread exhibit haze and/or other distractions which would keep them out of the "moose" category. Please folks, let's not kill the "moose" by exhausting it through over-hype.
I'll show you in person some time....you might change your mind holding the coin in hand.
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>For definition sake ; This would be a dog , pig , overweight water buffalo , or not even in the running ?
Geez, if you don't like it, go eat a granola bar or something. Thanks for noticing it though.
Anyway, that "Medal" while extrordinarily cool, is just a kitten compared to this:
NGC MS68* Wisconsin. A true MOOSE!
<< <i>Sorry, Coinlieutenant, that is a very nice looking coin, but a "moose" it is not. Don't feel too badly, though, as at least it's not a "dog", a "pig" or a "goat".
Edited to add:
<< <i>This coin is the moose for this die marriage in my opinion. >>
Gladiator, in order to qualify as an official "moose" a coin must stand on its own as such. It can't be merely a relative "moose" or a moose's relative, either, for that matter.
Coin LT's half dime is a MOOSE ! I know the coin well.....
Ken
You guys rescued this thread. It was quickly degenerating into another stinkin' hairyhead thread!
Nice try Russ.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
Russ, NCNE >>
THat looks like a MartyVision coin!!!