Home U.S. Coin Forum

A good example of why it's stupid to buy conditionally rare moderns.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
PR65DCAM Accented Hair Kennedy brings $1013 - a new record price.

The old record was $967 (one I sold). Two years ago these were selling for $450 to $500. Yep, these moderns have nowhere to go but down. image

Russ, NCNE
«1

Comments

  • originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,968 ✭✭✭✭
    Of course you realize Russ, any coin worth less than 3 G's hardly qualifies as a "real" coin.


  • Buyer could have gotten much more bang for his bucks by purchasing several hundred 'spaghetti hair' Kennedys made from the 1990s onward. Yarf!!!!
    Enjoy each day as though it was your last.
  • GemineyeGemineye Posts: 5,374


    << <i>Yep, these moderns have nowhere to go but down. image

    Russ, NCNE >>



    image
    ......Larry........image
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How many of these do you think were made in CAM or DCAM, Russ?

    Tempus fugit.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I prefer absolute modern rarities like this one.

    image

    Note that there are two mintmarks on this hub trial. The purpose of this piece was probably to determine where the mintmark would be placed on the die.

    Of course they would have to bodybag the thing, right?
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How many of these do you think were made in CAM or DCAM, Russ? >>



    I figure about 2000 true two sided cameos, and about 200 true two sided deep cameos.

    Russ, NCNE
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    That one looks like a pretty nice dcam! image
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Andy,

    That's butt ugly. Can I have it?

    Russ, NCNE
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,245 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It probably helps a little too that Morris is one of the best (if not the best) at taking photos of DCAM coins (and, toned coins too- check his other auctions he's recently sold).

    peacockcoins

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's butt ugly. Can I have it?

    Maybe if you're good. Of course, there's no chance of that...

    image
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A good example of why it's stupid to buy conditionally rare moderns.

    we should just quit trying to prove the point, at least that's what i'm attempting to do. at the same time, the queen continues to list top pop speculative coins and sees no parallel.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,798 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's butt ugly. Can I have it?

    Maybe if you're good. Of course, there's no chance of that...


    Ah, the classics collector/dealer has brought the modern collector/dealer to his knees. What will happen next? image
  • CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    I remember when the price of Pets.com stock kept going up.

    CG

    Edited to add: There were three bidders interested at prices above $600. One of them now owns the coin. If the third or second bidder finds another one, what happens to the price?

    And, I agree in advance that the same can happen in classics.

  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭
    Russ If there were only market makers in this modern crap, it would be a real marketimage

    funny thing is the values keep going up and you marty and I keep on making money.

    One day this modern will be classic, and we'll have one hell of a collection.image
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One day this modern will be classic, and we'll have one hell of a collection.

    I'm so happy I think I'm going to cry.

    image
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Somehow, I knew in advance this would be a sarcastic thread image
  • SmallSizedGuySmallSizedGuy Posts: 503 ✭✭✭
    I'm already convinced (and hooked)...

    As a collector who was trying to put together a nice set of cameo 1965-1967 SMS coins, I recently decided to chase nice cameo proof 1950-1970 coins. Thanks to the dealers (they know who they are - CU Forum members) who have been very fair!

    BTW, I have recently purchased a PCGS 1964 PR67CAM Accented Hair half, and I think it is a great coin!
    Jim Hodgson



    Collector of US Small Size currency, Atlanta FRNs, and Georgia nationals since 1977. Researcher of small size US type - seeking serial number data for all FRN star notes, Series 1928 to 1934-D. Life member SPMC.



  • Isn't a "conditionally rare modern" like:

    Military Intelligence
    Jumbo Shrimp
    defeaning silence
    mournful optimist
    pretty ugly

    image
    The Accumulator - Dark Lloyd of the Sith

    image
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This one looks like it went bird hunting with Dick Cheney. image

    image
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lloyd - On a similar note, ancient collectors laugh at the oxymoronic concept of "American Classics".
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This one looks like it went bird hunting with Dick Cheney

    Agreed. The first dozen shots seem to have missed the bird.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    I'm glad I read this thread. 100% excellent. image
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • DaveGDaveG Posts: 3,535
    C'mon guys, even Dave Bowers and Doug Winter caution the unwary against chasing after "conditionally rare" anything.

    It's just that the market is usually pretty thin at that altitude and you never know when you'll run into "air pockets".

    Check out the Southern Gold Society

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Russ:

    Sorry to inform you but as of this past weekend, we have ruled in the latest poll that 1964 coinage are officially classics.

    Please kindly refer to all your acccented coinage as classics.

    Oh well, guess you just have to be content as being an old has-been.image
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • "conditionally rare" ... is that like artificialy toned peace dollars??
    "Everyday above ground is a good day"

  • I think this just proves you can sell anything on eBay...............image
  • RegistryCoinRegistryCoin Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>ancient collectors laugh at the oxymoronic concept of "American Classics". >>


    This couldn't be truer, unless you mentioned the opinion of those collectors of ancients, which would also be true. image
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,310 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Let's revisit this thread in say 3-10 years and see how well this particular coin is doing. What goes up today........

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Take them to my local dealers and you'll see them go down really fast.image
    All glory is fleeting.
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    I still don't understand how market makers would help if the classic market dropped. Weren't they like Beanie Babies in 1989? Had you been selling exotic classics, how would market makers have helped your customers? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Are you saying moderns will be weak, because they're really just a fad, but real coins will not?
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,245 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I still don't understand how market makers would help if the classic market dropped. Weren't they like Beanie Babies in 1989? Had you been selling exotic classics, how would market makers have helped your customers? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Are you saying moderns will be weak, because they're really just a fad, but real coins will not? >>


    The Beanie Baby market doubled in Nov. of 1996 to Feb. of 1997 and then about three or four months later doubled again.
    It wasn't until the end of 1998 or so the market began its crash.

    I know because I was buying and selling them back then- on eBay using WebTv and no photos. Many times as soon as I received a Beanie I'd flip it right back on eBay and receive 50% or more. Of course it didn't help sellers back then who were not eBay savvy and would list them incorrectly (and not 'feature' the big ones).

    I was able to sort of get out in time but toward that end, due to counterfeiting, there were a couple of popular 'grading services' (BBMom was one of them...) that sprouted up and I sent about two dozen of the rarer ones in for authentification and 'grading'. It took four months, do to demand, to get them back. By the time I did the market had already begun its spiral downward and now I have them all in storage- each in their cute little sealed plastic boxes with their certificates.

    peacockcoins

  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1964 Accented Hair Kennedy is a proof-only issue. It's a one-year issue. It's an interesting die variety, and it's got the right attributes (scarce but not truly rare) that makes it appeal to collectors. Rather than an elongated serif or a slightly larger font, the detail is front and center on the portrait making it somewhat easy for the initiated to recognize. 1964 was the only circulating year in the 42-year long run of this coin issued in silver. It's the first year of issue. It memorializes someone who died within memory of many adults in this country, someone who was at least somewhat popular at the time of his death and whose popularity has continued to grow.

    Witness the 1909-S VDB, the 1932-D (or S) quarter, the 1916-D merc. These are other 20th century first year issues with special attributes.

    To claim that this is just a "conditionally rare modern" when it's actually a 42+ year old, proof-only, first year, unique die variety with all of these other attributes, is somewhat disingenuous, don't you think?
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame


  • << <i>Not everyone can consign.

    Why should anyone have to wait 3-5 days? There is no one they can call..... >>



    Most people do not live near a MAJOR MARKET MAKER either, so they have to mail their coins and wait for their money anyway, or wait for the next major show, and then drive to that show.

    Unless one of Tony Sopranos' hitmen is paying you a visit, waiting a week or two for payment is usually not a problem.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just to play a little bit of devils advocate here-----
    Russ, why didn't YOU bid on, and try to purchase, this coin in auction??? If it has so much legs under it wouldn't it have been a great coin to buy/hold/then flip?
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭✭
    The knock against moderns is that there must be a million deep cameo '64 or '65 Kennedys, MS69 Ikes or Franklins just sitting out there in pristine condition. Supposedly, all of the classics are accounted for except for one or two. I don't think the government knows how many bags are in the back of the vault. Again, if and when they come into the market, what will THEIR condition be?

    I received a piece of literature just yesterday exhaulting that values of Morgans and Peace dollars. "Twenty years ago, collectors lined up to pay $15,000 for a Morgan we are selling for $2,000 today. Buy now before the next upswing." That REALLY gives the reader mixed signals; exactly what Cladking was talking about

    That advertisement reminded me about the instability of coins in general, but classics in particular.

    Since I can't collect them all, I'll stick with my little modern niche that I don't think can hurt me. I don't mind little up and down swings, I just don't want something whose trend resembles a cliff.

    Joe
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • RGTRGT Posts: 508 ✭✭


    << <i>Not everyone can consign. Why should anyone have to wait 3-5 days? There is no one they can call..... . >>



    I don't collect moderns. Also, I've never spent $1000 or more on a coin. However, this makes no sense to me.

    Who in their right mind buys a collectable with money they are going to need on such short notice? If I thought there was any possible situation that would cause me to need my money back in less than 3-5 days I would never spend it on a collectable.

    What happened to buying coins only with money that you don't need and can afford to loose?
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Who in their right mind buys a collectable with money they are going to need on such short notice? >>



    Nobody. That's just one of her many strawman arguments.

    Russ, NCNE
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭


    << <i>...There are more dealers willing to buy "classic" coins than moderns, granted a few will try and rip you, but the marjoity will BUY them at top dollar. >>




    my guess is that the conventional wisdom would dispute the phrases "a few" and "top dollar"...... (conventional wisdom can't deal with "marjoity.")


    ps. don't have the link but a wisconsin "extra leaf low," (or more common variety), in an anacs 66 slab sold for something between 5 and 600 yesterday as well.


    ah, if only there were some market makers..........
  • CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭


    << <i>There are only a couple of circumstances under which I buy already graded coins. The first is if I think it's an upgrade candidate. The second is if I think I can flip it immediately for a profit. Neither applies in this case >>




    Interesting comment from someone who has his finger on the pulse of this market. Russ won't buy properly graded coins unless he can flip them immediately at a profit. Why? We know that he prefers to make them himself. But if the market is really strong and going to continue upward, why not buy them now at marekt prices or even bid them up to promote the market?

    CG
  • The largest percentage of all modern coins that are slabbed are sold via large telemarketing companies or on TV to people who don't kbow the value and who are buying them because they are being hawked as goo deals. These sellers DO NOT buy the coins back which leaves the largest percentage of teh audience who buys moderns out in the cold.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The largest percentage of all modern coins that are slabbed are sold via large telemarketing companies or on TV to people who don't kbow the value and who are buying them because they are being hawked as goo deals. These sellers DO NOT buy the coins back which leaves the largest percentage of teh audience who buys moderns out in the cold. >>



    Sounds eerily similar to the way generic gold is marketed to the unwary and sold at many times bullion value. Every show I attend I see older folks trying to sell their Liberty's and Saint's that they bought at a couple grand each from some huckster.

    Russ, NCNE
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭


    << <i>... I see older folks trying to sell their Liberty's and Saint's that they bought at a couple grand each from some huckster.

    >>




    now, now, we like to call them "market makers" here.
  • First---Kennedys are the most collected coin Worldwide, and the Russ' example is a near rare example of a coin with the perfect population to appreciate long term. Sort of like the unc. 1955 DDO cents for $150 that Bowers says he marketed.

    Secord---Russ seems to imply (I know he's not) that because these have gone up $, they're great investments. No, they're stores of value w/o income or cash flow--just like bullion. In fact classic coins are closer to bullion, as both have "market makers" which by definition are associated with Exchanges (as in NYSE), or public auction houses (as in stock placements via Merrill Lynch).
    morgannut2
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Tulip bulbs, get your tulip bulbs here, red hot

    tulip bulbs. That being said, selective moderns,

    purchased at a reasonable price, with some professional

    guidence can be both profitable and fun. As for myself, I have a mix

    of classic and modern coins. My collecting has become rather eclectic.

    As an example many silver quarters from the 40s, 50s and 60s in premium

    MS-66 condition are overlooked and getting rare. Too many MS-66s have marks

    dings or poor color or luster that would really downgrade them from the 66 grade.

    You pick out the true Gems and in a reasonable period of time you will have real value

    in your collection. The next jump to MS-67 for most of these quarters is around 4 figuers.

    Who knows how many premium 66s are really 67s?
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • RegistryCoinRegistryCoin Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭✭
    Eclectic Bashers Unite!
  • shirohniichanshirohniichan Posts: 4,992 ✭✭✭
    Aren't thinly-traded condition rarities risky, no matter their "classic" or "modern" status?

    For example, aren't common date Morgans in MS-67 plus more likely to fall dramatically than scarcer dates in MS-65 or below when times get tough?
    image
    Obscurum per obscurius
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Aren't thinly-traded condition rarities risky, no matter their "classic" or "modern" status? >>



    Shame on you for injecting reality in to this discussion.

    Russ, NCNE
  • shirohniichanshirohniichan Posts: 4,992 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Aren't thinly-traded condition rarities risky, no matter their "classic" or "modern" status? >>



    Shame on you for injecting reality in to this discussion.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    Sorry. I'll go back to Open Forum drivel. image
    image
    Obscurum per obscurius

  • These are not true market makers but rather more like brokers. Funny thing is, if it were not for the popularity of the modern coins, the classic coin market would be sound asleep and the spread on their "two sided" markets would be so large you could fly the space shuttle thru it.

    imho.

    imageimage


  • << <i>Somehow, I knew in advance this would be a sarcastic thread image >>

    When Russ is posting, I always start with that assumption and then change it as necessary (Which isn't too often image)
    -George
    42/92

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file