Cello vs wax
lawnmowerman
Posts: 19,477 ✭✭✭✭
In everyones experience which do you think has the better quality cards as far as corner or edge damage goes? Or does it even matter? I know with wax sometimes comes gum problems but is there a drawback to cello?
thanks
Matt
thanks
Matt
0
Comments
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
versus
all depends i guess huh?
Julen
RIP GURU
I dislike Cellos. They can kill the corners and they likely have been looked through more often than wax because you could see the top and bottom card. With all the movement of the packs can be tough on the corners too.
A like rack then wax. I would even buy vending over cellos because I thnk the quility is similar and the value is better.
My Auctions
Then vending, and last would be cellos...in my experience opening, and then grading, cellos provide your worst shot at quality cards.
<< <i>Rack, then wax is correct.
Then vending, and last would be cellos...in my experience opening, and then grading, cellos provide your worst shot at quality cards. >>