Nice coins aren't cheap and cheap coins aren't nice...

...I know this can be construed as a "vague" statement that does not apply to all coins but I feel it makes sense when it comes to color-toned silver coins. It just seems that the mind-blowing color-toned monsters command such an outrageous premium where coins that are not very appealing or somewhat appealing, but still toned, don't generally sell for high premiums. Ofcourse the term "nice" is defined in the eye of the beholder because what might be nice to me, might be downright fugly to another.
Any thoughts on this?
Any thoughts on this?



0
Comments
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
David
TorinoCobra71
RYK's old man taught him long ago: "You get what you pay for."
<< <i>Any thoughts on this?
RYK's old man taught him long ago: "You get what you pay for." >>
Sadly, often people pay for what they don't get. matteproof
In my experience coins that have outstanding toning that most all people see as very special do command outrageous prices.
Clean white Commems with superb luster always command a premium but not nearly like those that are specially toned.
Commems with ordinary toning dictate current sheet pricing.
The Commems with unattractive, too dark, or blotchey toning will change hands at sight unseen prices.
<< <i>Any thoughts on this? >>
Right now, some people are paying massive premiums for very common coins with what they consider exceptional toning.
What is exceptional toning? I don't know, but I guess some people know it when they see it - and thats great, as long as some future buyer sees it too when it comes time for you to sell.
My concern would be that artifical toning technology is likely to improve in the coming years, rendering exceptional toning merely commonplace.
This advice is interesting when you apply it to some toned coin offerings/transactions- such as past threads involving some vividly toned anaconda offerings that some (many?) thought could be AT. Some people want you to pay a lot, as that would justify a coin as being as valuable as some people want it to be........
<< <i>Quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten. >>
So true! Slightly over 3 years ago I paid a ridiculous $1000 for a rare British penny. The dealers comment was "once gone, gone"!
Well, I'm glad I bought it because I haven't seen anything near the quality since and this one would easily fetch $4000+ if sold today....I think I'll keep it for another 20 years or so.
Just look at the 1886 & 1887 Morgan dollars in MS65-66 from the Battle Creek Collection that fetched $6000-$12000 because of the quality of the toning. Amazing considering they are common dates. Imagine what a CC or key date would fetch!
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
What is exceptional toning? I don't know, but I guess some people know it when they see it - and thats great, as long as some future buyer sees it too when it comes time for you to sell.
My concern would be that artifical toning technology is likely to improve in the coming years, rendering exceptional toning merely commonplace. >>
My thought exactly!! It's for this very reason that I cannot get all worked up over toined coins.
Chris
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
i also worry that people who are buying toned coins are not
seeing what is hidden by the tarnish.
with gold, it is so easy to see the luster and every little mark.
toned silver? that might take more training.