How did Conder tokens gain legitimacy?
![XpipedreamR](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/bpiconppdog.gif)
Given that they were neither precious metal nor government issued. Was is simply out of absolute need for lower denominated coinage? What did the English government have to say about this (if anything) at the time?
0
Comments
09/07/2006
09/07/2006
My OmniCoin Collection
My BankNoteBank Collection
Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
George III had discontinued the making of copper coins in 1775. He found that they did not circulate. There were two main reasons. The huge number of counterfeit coins in circulation would be spent first — if the holder could get anyone to accept them. The nice, new, shiny penny would be saved — part of “Gresham’s Law”— that states that “Bad money drives the good money out.” The second reason they did not circulate was the counterfeiter — who would gather up the new issues, melt them down, and make 2 or 3 lightweight coppers out of one good one — thus doubling or tripling their money. Obviously, this latter only added to the counterfeits in circulation.
A third reason existed. The large cities often had enough — or even an abundance — of coin. That most of it was “bad” coin was a fact, but at least it existed. The small towns out in the “provinces” were often completely without coin. Money has a habit of flowing to the major trade centers, never to return."