Grade this card !

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 12:46PM

">bench

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:17PM

would ya say maybe a 9 ??

easttexascardsandgames · March 18, 2005 1:20PM

I think it will grade X.. I do not see the image..

ajw · March 18, 2005 1:21PM

Is this one of the new Topps 2005 Super Invisible Black Refractors? How can you even tell if the card's in the holder?

1979COLLECTOR · March 18, 2005 1:23PM

X = 10, nice card.

wolfbear · March 18, 2005 1:23PM

Corners look super sharp, but are you sure it's not trimmed ?

Seems to be more of a square than rectangle.

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:24PM

how come i can see it and you cant?

wolfbear · March 18, 2005 1:26PM

You can see it because it's on your hard drive.

It has to be uploaded to the internet for us to see it.

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:28PM

how about now???

Mac53 · March 18, 2005 1:35PM

I don't see it.

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:46PM

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:49PM

OOps wrong picture ! But feel free to grade it if you want. Hoe in the world do you place a picture in a message without making it an attachment? Most of my picture attachments are over the allowed mb size that it will accept.

brianwintersfan · March 18, 2005 1:49PM

Needs to be scanned with the cover up.Need a dark background to make it stand out better.

Lodi · March 18, 2005 1:49PM

You should leave your scanner lid open. It's much easier to see a white stock card on a black background.

bobbybakeriv · March 18, 2005 1:50PM

With the white border on a white background, I honestly can't give you my opinion. Sorry. Can you provide a different scan?

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 1:50PM

so can you see it now??? all pics or just the scan?

brianwintersfan · March 18, 2005 1:54PM

Just sent you a PM tennbanker

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 2:07PM

Can you see this one????

brianwintersfan · March 18, 2005 2:11PM

No

wolfbear · March 18, 2005 2:11PM

Man, I still can't see it !

Lodi · March 18, 2005 2:13PM

What would this grade?

brianwintersfan · March 18, 2005 2:21PM

I know scanners can make corners and edges look worse then they are.I see some stuff along the bottom edge that might make me say 7.

easttexascardsandgames · March 18, 2005 2:27PM

7

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 2:34PM

howd you do that?

Lodi · March 18, 2005 2:40PM

I've got Aol, and I use the "You've got pictures" to host the pics.

How about this one?

The Stargell should be a 7.5!

PSA standards don't even mention edges until EX-MT 6. I assume you guys are saying an 8 can have no white on the edges?

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 2:49PM

Ok hows this then

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 2:50PM

brianwintersfan · March 18, 2005 3:54PM

<< <i>The Stargell should be a 7.5! >>

Well since they don't have half grades it would be a 7.
Ryan a 6 or 7

justanoldtimer · March 18, 2005 8:48PM

Your bench is a 7 or 8 depending on the back but the touch in the top left corner will kill any hopes of a mint..

jayhawke · March 18, 2005 8:56PM

I felt like I was listening to Abbott and Costello. Who's on First?

metsfan · March 18, 2005 11:17PM

Lodi:
Are those wax stains on the Ryan? Or just print marks? The card is o/c t/b. Not a bad looking card.

tennesseebanker · March 18, 2005 11:19PM

wow I really need to re-scan this card iff you guys think it is a seven.

A761506 · March 18, 2005 11:43PM

Your Bench card is an 8, probably not worth getting graded as the upper left corner removes any possibility of it getting a 9.

easttexascardsandgames · March 18, 2005 11:55PM

The Stargell should be a 7.5! PSA standards don't even mention edges until EX-MT 6. I assume you guys are saying an 8 can have no white on the edges?

The 71s are a little different due to their black borders any little mark becomes obvious affecting the over all eye appeal of the card. Usually if it is obvious with the naked eye it is no better than a 7.

Grade this card !

Comments