Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Comments

  • image
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders

  • That's not a mule, that's a horse ... oh wait, ... I get it. image
    Life got you down? Listen to John Coltrane.
  • AuldFartteAuldFartte Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭✭
    image what a doofus.
    image

    My OmniCoin Collection
    My BankNoteBank Collection
    Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    image
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • GARDES VF
    I'm not afraid to die
    I'm afraid to be alive without being aware of it

    image
  • IIRC, this issue was cupro-nickel and the 'coin' illustrated looks 'way more copper than cupro-nickel...

    Who knows, maybe his scanner is color-blind...

    Or am I missing something???

    Please advise...
    Jay formerly of Garrison, TX
  • Bwahhahahahahahahaaahah image
    4 765 of 50 971 (9.35%) complete image

    First DAMMIT BOY! 25/9/05 (Finally!)

    " XpipedreamR is cool because you can get a bottle of 500 for like a dollar. " - Aspirin

    image
  • image


    So how come nobody here sniped it? image
    Askari



    Come on over ... to The Dark Side! image
  • MSD61MSD61 Posts: 3,382


    << <i>image


    So how come nobody here sniped it? image >>



    Cause I haven't had a chance yet.image I think the guy took these pics under a very yellow light...I hope that's the case cause I've never seen a silver crown look so copper in color or it's just really tonedimage

    I know you guys are joking around...LOL!!! But the 1961 mule halfcrown is an interesting error coin. The 1961 mule halfcrown was struck in error from a reverse die from of the 1928-37 type. In the preparation of the 1961 restrike of the 1928 proofs the original dies were tested and found not to be in suitable for use in producing the new proof coins. In this process the halfcrown die from the 1928 series was introduced into the production run for circulating 1961 halfcrowns. The 1961 variety is not particularly difficult to find, but examples in extremely fine or better condition are very scarce. The variety was spotted by Derek Young (Editor of Irish Numismatics) in 1967 and at the time he estimated that there had been about 50,000 struck. It is still unknown if this was done in error or on purpose by the mint.

    The 1961 mule halfcrowns are quite easy to detect the major differences are:

    1. The 'd' of 2s6d is open at the top on the mule but it is closed on a normal coin.

    2. The tail on the mule has a slightly 'bell-shaped' sides with 8 hairs the normal coin has a straight sided tail with 7 hairs.

    3. The lettering on the mule is finer and the spacing is different. Most notably the OI of COROIN are much closer together on the mule than the normal coin.

    4. The designer's initials PM are larger and the P is not at all under the hoof, on the normal coin the initials are smaller and almost entirely under the hoof and the base of the 2 is longer on the mule than the regular coin.

    image
  • WOW! Thanks, that is neat to know.....image
Sign In or Register to comment.